Pharmacology: Pharmacodynamics: Mechanism of action: RYALTRIS contains both olopatadine hydrochloride and mometasone furoate. These drugs represent 2 different classes of medications (histamine H1-receptor antagonist and synthetic corticosteroid).
Onset of action has been investigated in a double-blind, double-dummy, randomised parallel, comparative study with RYALTRIS, Azelastine Hydrochloride and Fluticasone Propionate nasal spray, Olopatadine nasal spray, and placebo in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis in an environmental exposure chamber setting (EEC). Onset of action was observed within 10 minutes, defined as the first of two consecutive time points after initiation of treatment at which RYALTRIS demonstrated a statistically significant difference in iTNSS change from baseline compared with placebo (p=0.02) as long as the significant difference was sustainable.
Olopatadine Hydrochloride: Olopatadine is an anti-allergic compound which has been demonstrated to stabilise human conjunctival tissue mast cells, preventing the release of histamine and other inflammatory mediators. Olopatadine is a selective histamine H1-receptor antagonist (Ki values for histamine H1, H2 and H3 receptors were 32 nM, 100 μM and 79 μM, respectively) that inhibits Type I immediate hypersensitivity reactions. Olopatadine has no significant effects on alpha-adrenergic, dopamine and muscarinic Type 1 and 2 receptors.
Mometasone Furoate: Mometasone furoate is a topical glucocorticosteroid with local anti-inflammatory properties at doses that are not systemically active.
In studies utilising nasal antigen challenge, mometasone furoate nasal spray has shown anti-inflammatory activity in both the early- and late-phase allergic responses. This has been demonstrated by decreases (vs placebo) in histamine and eosinophil activity and reductions (vs baseline) in eosinophils, neutrophils and epithelial cell adhesion proteins.
Corticosteroids have been shown to have a wide range of effects on multiple cell types (e.g., mast cells, eosinophils, neutrophils, macrophages, and lymphocytes) and mediators (e.g., histamine, eicosanoids, leukotrienes, and cytokines) involved in inflammation.
Clinical Trials: Adolescents and Adults (12 years of age and older): The efficacy and safety of RYALTRIS in adults and adolescents 12 years of age and older with allergic rhinitis were evaluated in 4 studies (GSP 301-201, GSP 301-301, GSP 301-303 and GSP 301-304).
2-week studies: Three (GSP 301-201, GSP 301-301 and GSP 301-304) studies were similarly designed randomised, multicentre, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled studies with a 2-week duration in 2,971 seasonal allergic rhinitis subjects. The population of the studies was 12 to 87 years of age (64.3% female, 35.7% male).
Patients were randomized to 1 of 4 treatment groups: 2 sprays per nostril twice daily of RYALTRIS, olopatadine hydrochloride nasal spray, mometasone furoate nasal spray, and vehicle (pH 3.7) placebo. The olopatadine hydrochloride and mometasone furoate comparators used the same device and vehicle as RYALTRIS but are not commercially marketed. Assessment of efficacy was based on the patient-reported reflective total nasal symptom score (rTNSS), instantaneous total nasal symptom score (iTNSS), and reflective and instantaneous total ocular symptom score (rTOSS and iTOSS, respectively). The rTNSS and iTNSS were calculated as the sum of the patient-reported symptom scores of 4 individual nasal symptoms (rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, sneezing, and nasal itching) on a 0 to 3 categorical severity scale (0=absent, 1=mild, 2=moderate, and 3=severe).
Similarly, rTOSS and iTOSS were calculated using the 3 eye-related, non-nasal symptoms of itching/burning eyes, tearing/watering eyes, and redness of eyes using the same severity scale. Patients were required to record symptom severity daily (morning [AM] and evening [PM]), reflecting over the previous 12 hours (reflective) or at the time of recording (instantaneous). The primary efficacy endpoint was the mean change from baseline in average AM and PM patient-reported 12-hour rTNSS over the 2-week treatment period. The average AM and PM rTNSS (maximum score of 12) was assessed as the change from baseline for each day and then averaged over a 2-week treatment period.
Across the studies, treatment with RYALTRIS resulted in a statistically significant improvement in rTNSS compared with placebo. Results of the primary efficacy endpoint from the studies are shown in Table 1. Representative results from Study GSP 301-304 and GSP 301-301 are shown in Figure 1 and Figure 2. (See Table 1, Figure 1 and Figure 2.)
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
AM=morning; LS=least square; NS=nasal spray; PM=evening.
†§* Indicate a significant difference when compared with placebo (p<0.05).
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
AM=morning; HCl=hydrochloride; LS=least-squares; CI=confidence interval; NS=nasal spray; MMRM=mixed-effect model for repeated measures; PM=evening. †§* Statistically significant difference versus placebo (p<0.05). LS means, 95% CIs, and p values are based on MMRM model with change from baseline as dependent variable, treatment group and site as fixed effect, baseline as covariate, and study day as the within-subject effect.
In these studies, RYALTRIS also demonstrated statistically significant improvement in iTNSS as compared with placebo and demonstrated statistically significant improvements compared with placebo for each of the 4 individual nasal symptoms evaluated as rTNSS (p<0.05) and iTNSS (p<0.05).
Representative results from Study GSP 301-304 are shown in Figure 3. (See Figure 3.)
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
AM=morning; CI=confidence interval; LS=least square; NS=nasal spray; PM=evening.
†§* Indicate a significant difference when compared with placebo (p<0.05).
RYALTRIS demonstrated statistically significant improvement compared with placebo in the change from baseline in average AM and PM patient-reported 12-hour rTOSS and iTOSS over a 2-week treatment period.
Following the initial dose, marked improvement in iTNSS has been observed over the first week and was sustained through two weeks of treatment.
The subjective impact of seasonal allergic rhinitis on a patient's health-related quality of life was evaluated by the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire - Standardized Activities (RQLQ[S]) (28 questions in 7 domains [activities, sleep, non-nose/eye symptoms, practical problems, nasal symptoms, eye symptoms, and emotional] evaluated on a 7-point scale, in which 0=no impairment and 6=maximum impairment). An overall RQLQ(S) score is calculated from the mean of all items in the instrument. In each of these studies, treatment with RYALTRIS reduced the overall RQLQ(S) from baseline by greater, and statistically significant, margin than placebo (Study GSP 301-201 LS mean difference: -0.56 [95% CI: -0.95, -0.18]; Study GSP 301-301 LS mean difference: -0.43 [95% CI: -0.64, -0.21]; Study GSP 301-304 LS mean difference: -0.45 [95% CI: -0.68, -0.22]). In GSP 301-201, the treatment differences between RYALTRIS and placebo reached the minimum important difference of 0.5 points, which is considered a clinically meaningful improvement. However, the treatment difference between RYALTRIS and placebo in GSP 301-301 and GSP 301-304 were marginally less than the minimum important difference of 0.5 points.
52-week study: The fourth study of RYALTRIS (GSP 301-303), was a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled 52-week safety and efficacy study in subjects with perennial allergic rhinitis. It evaluated 24-hour (AM) rTNSS and iTNSS as secondary endpoints. Compared with placebo nasal spray pH 3.7, treatment with RYALTRIS (n=391) resulted in statistically significant improvement in the change in average AM patient-reported rTNSS and iTNSS over the first 6, 30, and 52 weeks vs baseline. (See Table 2.)
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
CI=confidence interval; LS=least square; MMRM=mixed model repeated measures; NS=nasal spray LS Means, 95% confidence intervals, and p-values are based on separate MMRM models for each week assessment, with change from baseline as dependent variables, treatment group and site as fixed effect, baseline as covariate, and week as the within-subject effect. (See Table 3.)
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
CI=confidence interval; LS=least square; MMRM=mixed model repeated measures; NS=nasal spray LS Means, 95% confidence intervals, and p-values are based on separate MMRM models for each week assessment, with change from baseline as dependent variables, treatment group and site as fixed effect, baseline as covariate, and week as the within-subject effect.
Paediatrics (6 to 11 years old): The safety and efficacy of RYALTRIS in the treatment of paediatric patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis was investigated in one clinical trial (GSP301-305). This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled study with a 2 week duration in 446 paediatric patients ranging from age 6 to 11 years.
Assessment of efficacy was similar to that for the 2-week studies in adolescents and adults. The primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline in average AM and PM subject-reported 12-hour rTNSS over the 14-day randomised treatment period. Secondary endpoints were change from baseline in average AM and PM subject-reported 12-hour iTNSS over a 14-day treatment period, change from baseline in average AM and PM subject-reported 12-hour rTOSS over the 14-day treatment period, change from baseline in the overall Paediatric Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (PRQLQ) score.
Treatment with RYALTRIS resulted in a statistically significant improvement in rTNSS compared with placebo. Results of the primary efficacy endpoint are shown in Table 4. The numerical improvement (p=0.527-0.010, multiple-test adjusted p>0.05) at days 1-3 and the statistically significant improvement in rTNSS from day 4 (p<0.001, multiple-test adjusted p<0.05) for each day is represented in Figure 4. (See Table 4 and Figure 4.)
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
AM=morning; CI=confidence interval; FAS=full analysis set; LS=least square; PM=evening; rTNSS=Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score.
*Statistically significant (adjusted p<0.05).
RYALTRIS also demonstrated statistically significant improvement in iTNSS as compared with placebo and demonstrated numerical improvements compared with placebo for each of the 4 individual nasal symptoms evaluated as rTNSS and iTNSS.
RYALTRIS demonstrated a numerical improvement compared with placebo in the change from baseline in average AM and PM patient-reported 12 hour rTOSS and iTOSS over a 2 week treatment period.
The patient's health-related quality of life was evaluated by the Paediatric Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (PRQLQ) (23 questions in 5 domains [nose symptoms, eye symptoms, practical problems, activity limitation and other symptoms] evaluated on a 7-point scale, in which 0=not bothered/none of the time and 6=extremely bothered/all of the time). An overall RQLQ(S) score is calculated from the mean of all items in the instrument. Treatment with RYALTRIS significantly reduced the overall PRQLQ from baseline comparing to placebo (LS mean difference: -0.3 [95% CI: -0.5, -0.1], p<0.001).
Pharmacokinetics: Absorption: After repeated intranasal administration of 2 sprays per nostril of RYALTRIS (2,660 mcg of olopatadine hydrochloride and 100 mcg of mometasone furoate) twice daily in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis, the mean (±standard deviation) peak plasma exposure (Cmax) was 19.80±7.01 ng/mL for olopatadine and 9.92±3.74 pg/mL for mometasone furoate, and the mean exposure over the dosing regimen (AUCtau) was 88.77±23.87 ng/mL*hr for olopatadine and 58.40±27.00 pg/mL*hr for mometasone furoate. The median time to peak exposure from a single dose was 1 hour for both olopatadine and mometasone furoate.
The systemic bioavailability of olopatadine and mometasone furoate from RYALTRIS following intranasal administration was estimated to be comparable with olopatadine hydrochloride and mometasone furoate nasal sprays administered as monotherapies.
Distribution: The protein binding of olopatadine was moderate at approximately 55% in human serum and independent of drug concentration over the range of 0.1 to 1,000 ng/mL. Olopatadine binds predominately to human serum albumin.
The in vitro protein binding for mometasone furoate was reported to be 98% to 99% in concentration range of 5 to 500 ng/mL.
Metabolism: Olopatadine is not extensively metabolized. Based on plasma metabolite profiles following oral administration of [14C] olopatadine, at least 6 minor metabolites circulate in human plasma. Olopatadine accounts for 77% of peak plasma total radioactivity and all metabolites amounted to <6% combined. Two of these have been identified as the olopatadine N-oxide and N desmethyl olopatadine. In in vitro studies with cDNA-expressed human CYP isoenzymes and flavin-containing monooxygenases (FMO), N-desmethyl olopatadine (Ml) formation was catalyzed mainly by CYP3A4, while olopatadine N-oxide (M3) was primarily catalyzed by FMO1 and FMO3. Olopatadine at concentrations up to 33,900 ng/mL did not inhibit the in vitro metabolism of specific substrates for CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP2E1, and CYP3A4. The potential for olopatadine and its metabolites to act as inducers of CYP enzymes has not been evaluated.
Studies have shown that any portion of a mometasone furoate dose that is swallowed and absorbed undergoes extensive metabolism to multiple metabolites. There are no major metabolites detectable in plasma. Upon
in vitro incubation, one of the minor metabolites formed is 6ß-hydroxy-mometasone furoate. In human liver microsomes, the formation of the metabolite is regulated by CYP3A4.
Elimination: Following single-dose intranasal administration of a combination of olopatadine and mometasone furoate (2,660 μg of olopatadine HCl and 200 μg of mometasone furoate), the mean elimination half-lives of olopatadine and mometasone furoate were 8.63 and 18.11 hours, respectively.
Olopatadine is mainly eliminated through urinary excretion. Approximately 70% of a [14C] olopatadine hydrochloride oral dose was recovered in urine with 17% in the feces. Of the drug-related material recovered within the first 24 hours in the urine, 86% was unchanged olopatadine, with the balance comprised of olopatadine N-oxide and N-desmethyl olopatadine.
Following intravenous administration, the effective plasma elimination half-life of mometasone furoate was 5.8 hours. Any absorbed drug is excreted as metabolites mostly via the bile, and to a limited extent, into the urine.
Special Populations: No pharmacokinetic studies were performed in special populations with RYALTRIS. The pharmacokinetics of the combination of olopatadine and mometasone furoate is expected to reflect that of the individual components, as the pharmacokinetics of the combination was found to be comparable to the individual components.
Hepatic Impairment: No specific pharmacokinetic study examining the effect of hepatic impairment was conducted. Metabolism of olopatadine is a minor route of elimination.
Administration of a single inhaled dose of 400 mcg mometasone furoate to subjects with mild (n=4), moderate (n=4), and severe (n=4) hepatic impairment resulted in only 1 or 2 subjects in each group having detectable peak plasma concentrations of mometasone furoate (ranging from 50 to 105 pcg/mL). The observed peak plasma concentrations appeared to increase with severity of hepatic impairment; however, the numbers of detectable levels were low.
Based on data from the individual components, no adjustment of the dosing regimen of RYALTRIS is warranted in patients with hepatic impairment.
Renal Insufficiency: The mean C
max values for olopatadine following single intranasal doses were not markedly different between healthy subjects (18.1 ng/mL) and patients with mild, moderate, and severe renal impairment (ranging from 15.5 to 21.6 ng/mL). Mean plasma AUC0-12 was 2-fold higher in patients with severe impairment (creatinine clearance <30 mL/min/1.73 m
2). In these patients, peak steady-state plasma concentrations of olopatadine were approximately 10-fold lower than those observed after higher, 20 mg oral doses, twice daily, which were well tolerated.
The effects of renal impairment on mometasone furoate pharmacokinetics have not been adequately investigated.
Based on data from the individual components, no adjustment of the dosing regimen of RYALTRIS is warranted in patients with renal impairment.
Age: RYALTRIS pharmacokinetics has not been investigated in patients under 12 years of age. Based on population pharmacokinetic analysis among patients 12 years of age and older, the pharmacokinetics of Olopatadine and mometasone furoate with RYALTRIS was not influenced by age.
Gender: Based on population pharmacokinetic analysis, the pharmacokinetics of olopatadine and mometasone furoate with RYALTRIS was not influenced by gender.
Race: Based on population pharmacokinetic analysis, the pharmacokinetics of olopatadine and mometasone furoate with RYALTRIS was not influenced by race.
Toxicology: Preclinical safety data: Genotoxicity: No genotoxicity was observed when olopatadine was tested in an in vitro bacterial reverse mutation (Ames) test, an in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration assay or an in vivo mouse micronucleus test.
Mometasone furoate is not considered to be genotoxic. There was no evidence of mutagenicity in in vitro tests which included tests for reverse mutation in
Salmonella typhimurium and
Escherichia coli and forward gene mutation in a mouse lymphoma cell line. Limited evidence of clastogenicity was obtained in Chinese Hamster ovary cells, although this finding was not confirmed in a second in vitro assay utilising Chinese Hamster lung cells, nor in vivo assays including a mouse spermatogonia chromosomal aberration assay, a mouse micronucleus assay, and a rat bone marrow clastogenicity assay. Mometasone furoate did not cause DNA damage in rat liver cells.
Carcinogenicity: No carcinogenicity studies have been conducted with olopatadine hydrochloride and mometasone furoate in combination. Studies performed with the individual active components are described as follows.
Olopatadine Hydrochloride: Olopatadine administered orally was not carcinogenic in mice and rats at doses of up to 500 and 200 mg/kg/day, respectively (approximately 360-420, 290-340 and 360-450 times the MRHD for adults, adolescents ≥12 years of age and children 6-11 years of age, respectively, by intranasal administration on a mg/m
2 basis).
Mometasone Furoate Monohydrate: In a 2-year carcinogenicity study in Sprague Dawley rats, mometasone furoate demonstrated no statistically significant increase in the incidence of tumours at inhalational doses up to 67 micrograms/kg/day (approximately 2.6-3 times the MHRD for adolescents ≥12 years of age and adults, and 3.2 times for children 6-11 years of age, by intranasal administration on a microgram/m
2 basis). In a 19-month carcinogenicity study in Swiss CD-1 mice, mometasone furoate demonstrated no statistically significant increase in the incidence of tumours at inhalational doses up to 160 microgram/kg/day (approximately 3.1-3.6 times the MRHD for adolescents ≥12 years of age and adults, and 3.8 times for children 6-11 years of age, by intranasal administration on a microgram/m
2 basis).