Mode of Action: Tigecycline, a glycylcycline antibiotic, inhibits protein translation in bacteria by binding to the 30S ribosomal subunit and blocking entry of amino-acyl tRNA molecules into the A site of the ribosome. This prevents incorporation of amino acid residues into elongating peptide chains. Tigecycline carries a glycylamido moiety attached to the 9-position of minocycline. The substitution pattern is not present in any naturally occurring or semisynthetic tetracycline and imparts certain microbiologic properties that transcend any known tetracycline derivative
in vitro or
in vivo activity. In addition, tigecycline is able to overcome the 2 major tetracycline resistance mechanisms, ribosomal protection and efflux. Accordingly, tigecycline has demonstrated
in vitro and
in vivo activity against a broad spectrum of bacterial pathogens. There has been no cross-resistance observed between tigecycline and other antibiotics. In
in vitro studies, no antagonism has been observed between tigecycline and other commonly used antibiotics. In general, tigecycline is considered bacteriostatic. At 4 times the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), a 2-log reduction in colony counts was observed with tigecycline against
Enterococcus spp,
Staphylococcus aureus and
Escherichia coli. However, tigecycline has shown some bactericidal activity and a 3-log reduction was observed against
Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Tigecycline has also demonstrated bactericidal activity against common respiratory strains of
S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae and L. pneumophila.
Dilution Techniques: Quantitative methods are used to determine antimicrobial MICs. These MICs provide estimates of the susceptibility of bacteria to antimicrobial compounds. The MICs should be determined using a standardized procedure based on dilution methods (broth, agar or microdilution) or equivalent using standardized inoculum and concentrations of tigecycline. For broth dilution tests for aerobic organisms, MICs must be determined in testing medium that is fresh (<12 hrs old). The MIC values should be interpreted according to the criteria provided in Table 1. (See Table 1.)
Diffusion Techniques: Quantitative methods that require measurement of zone diameters also provide reproducible estimates of the susceptibility of bacteria to antimicrobial compounds. The standardized procedure requires the use of standardized inoculum concentrations. This procedure uses paper disks impregnated with tigecycline 15 mcg to test the susceptibility of microorganisms to tigecycline. Interpretation involves correlation of the diameter obtained in the disk test with the MIC for tigecycline. Reports from the laboratory providing results of the standard single-disk susceptibility test with a 15-mcg tigecycline disk should be interpreted according to the criteria in Table 1. (See Table 1.)
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
A report of "susceptible" indicates that the pathogen is likely to be inhibited if the antimicrobial compound reaches the concentrations usually achievable. A report of "intermediate" indicates that the result should be considered equivocal, and if the microorganism is not fully susceptible to alternative, clinically feasible drugs, the test should be repeated. This category implies possible clinical applicability in body sites where the drug is physiologically concentrated or in situations where high dosage of drug can be used. This category also provides a buffer zone that prevents small, uncontrolled technical factors from causing major discrepancies in interpretation. A report of "resistant" indicates that the pathogen is not likely to be inhibited if the antimicrobial compound reaches the concentrations usually achievable; other therapy should be selected.
Quality Control: As with other susceptibility techniques, the use of laboratory control microorganisms is required to control the technical aspects of the laboratory standardized procedures. Standard tigecycline powder should provide the MIC values provided in Table 2. For the diffusion technique using the 15-mcg tigecycline disk, laboratories should use the criteria provided in Table 2 to test quality control strains. (See Table 2.)
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
The prevalence of acquired resistance may vary geographically and with time for selected species, and local information on resistance is desirable, particularly when treating severe infections. The following information provides only approximate guidance on the probability as to whether the microorganism will be susceptible to tigecycline or not:
Susceptible: Gram-Positive Aerobes: Enterococcus avium, Enterococcus casseliflavus, Enterococcus faecalis* (includes vancomycin-susceptible strains),
Enterococcus faecalis (includes vancomycin-resistant strains),
Enterococcus faecium (includes vancomycin-susceptible and -resistant strains),
Enterococcus gallinarum, Listeria monocytogenes, Staphylococcus aureus* [includes methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant strains, including isolates that bear molecular and virulence markers commonly associated with community-acquired methicillin-resistant
Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) including the SCCmec type IV element and the pvl gene],
Staphylococcus epidermidis (includes methicillin-susceptible and -resistant strains),
Staphylococcus haemolyticus, Streptococcus agalactiae*, Streptococcus anginosus* (includes
S. anginosus, S. intermedius, S. constellatus),
Streptococcus pyogenes*,
Streptococcus pneumoniae* (penicillin-susceptible isolates),
Streptococcus pneumoniae (penicillin-resistant isolates), Viridans group streptococci.
Gram-Negative Aerobes: Acinetobacter calcoaceticus/baumannii complex,
Aeromonas hydrophila, Citrobacter freundii*, Citrobacter koseri, Enterobacter aerogenes, Enterobacter cloacae*, Escherichia coli* [including extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing strains],
Haemophilus influenzae*, Haemophilus parainfluenzae, Klebsiella oxytoca*, Klebsiella pneumoniae* (including ESBL-producing strains),
Klebsiella pneumoniae (including AmpC-producing strains),
Legionella pneumophila*,
Moraxella catarrhalis*, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Neisseria meningitidis, Pasteurella multocida; Salmonella enterica ser. Enteritidis, Paratyphi, Typhi and
Typhimurium; Shigella boydii, Shigella dysenteriae, Shigella flexneri, Serratia marcescens, Shigella sonnei, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia.
Anaerobic Bacteria: Bacteroides fragilis*, Bacteroides distasonis, Bacteroides ovatus, Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron*, Bacteroides uniformis*, Bacteroides vulgatus*, Clostridium difficile, Clostridium perfringens*, Peptostreptococcus spp,
Peptostreptococcus micros*,
Porphyromonas spp and
Prevotella spp.
Atypical Bacteria: Chlamydia pneumoniae*, Mycobacterium abscessus, Mycobacterium chelonae, Mycobacterium fortuitum, Mycoplasma pneumoniae*.
*Clinical efficacy has been demonstrated for susceptible isolates in the approved clinical indications.
Resistant: Gram-Negative Aerobes: Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Anaerobic Bacteria: No naturally occurring species has been found to be inherently resistant to tigecycline.
Resistance: There have been no cross-resistance observed between tigecycline and other antibiotics.
Tigecycline is able to overcome the 2 major tetracycline resistance mechanisms, ribosomal protection and efflux.
In
in vitro studies, no antagonism has been observed between tigecycline and any other commonly used antibiotic class.
Pharmacodynamics: Clinical Efficacy: Complicated Skin and Skin Structure Infections: Tigecycline was evaluated in adults for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections (cSSSI) in 2 randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, multinational, multicenter studies. These studies compared tigecycline (100 mg IV initial dose followed by 50 mg every 12 hrs) with vancomycin (1 g IV every 12 hrs)/aztreonam (2 g IV every 12 hrs) for 5-14 days. Patients with complicated deep soft tissue infections including wound infections and cellulitis (≥10 cm, requiring surgery/drainage or with complicated, underlying disease), major abscesses, infected ulcers and burns were enrolled in the studies. The primary efficacy endpoint was the clinical response at the test of cure (TOC) visit in the co-primary populations of the clinically evaluable (CE) and clinical modified intent-to-treat (c-mITT) patients (see Table 3).
Clinical cure rates at TOC by pathogen in microbiologically evaluable patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections are presented in Table 4. (See Tables 3 and 4.)
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infections: Tigecycline was evaluated in adults for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI) in 2 randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, multinational, multicenter studies. These studies compared tigecycline (100 mg IV initial dose followed by 50 mg every 12 hrs) with imipenem/cilastatin (500 mg IV every 6 hrs) for 5-14 days. Patients with complicated diagnoses including appendicitis, cholecystitis, diverticulitis, gastric/duodenal perforation, intra-abdominal abscess, perforation of intestine and peritonitis were enrolled in the studies. The primary efficacy endpoint was the clinical response at the TOC visit for the co-primary populations of the microbiologically evaluable and the microbiologic modified intent-to-treat (m-mITT) patients. (See Table 5.)
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
Clinical cure rates at TOC by pathogen in microbiologically evaluable patients with cIAI are presented in Table 6. (See Table 6.)
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
Community-Acquired Pneumonia (CAP): Tigecycline was evaluated in adults for the treatment of CAP in 2 randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, multinational, multicenter studies (studies 308 and 313). These studies compared tigecycline (100 mg IV initial dose followed by 50 mg every 12 hrs) with levofloxacin (500 mg IV every 12 or 24 hrs). In 1 study (study 308), after at least 3 days of IV therapy, a switch to oral levofloxacin (500 mg daily) was permitted for both treatment arms. Total therapy was 7-14 days. Patients with CAP who required hospitalization and IV therapy were enrolled in the studies. The primary efficacy endpoint was the clinical response at the TOC visit in the co-primary populations of the CE and c-mITT patients (see Table 7). Clinical cure rates at TOC by pathogen in microbiologically evaluable patients are presented in Table 8. (See Table 8.)
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus (VRE) spp and MRSA: Tigecycline was evaluated in adults for the treatment of various serious infections (cIAI, cSSSI and other infections) due to VRE and MRSA in study 307.
Study 307 was a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, multinational, multicenter study evaluating tigecycline (100 mg IV initial dose followed by 50 mg every 12 hrs) and vancomycin (1 g IV every 12 hrs) for the treatment of infections due to MRSA and evaluating tigecycline (100 mg IV initial dose followed by 50 mg every 12 hrs) and linezolid (600 mg IV every 12 hrs) for the treatment of infections due to VRE for 7-28 days. Patients with cIAI, cSSSI and other infections were enrolled in this study. The primary efficacy endpoint was the clinical response at the TOC visit for the co-primary populations of the microbiologically evaluable and m-mITT patients. (See Table 9 for MRSA and Table 10 for VRE.)
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
Resistant Gram-Negative Pathogens: Tigecycline was evaluated in adults for the treatment of various serious infections (cIAI, cSSSI, CAP and other infections) due to resistant gram-negative pathogens in study 309.
Study 309 was an open-label, multinational, multicenter study evaluating tigecycline (100 mg IV initial dose followed by 50 mg every 12 hrs) for the treatment of infections due to resistant gram-negative pathogens for 7-28 days. Patients with cIAI, cSSSI, CAP and other infections were enrolled in this study. The primary efficacy endpoint was the clinical response at the TOC visit for the co-primary populations of the microbiologically evaluable and m-mITT patients. (See Table 11.)
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
Rapidly Growing Mycobacterial Infections: In uncontrolled clinical studies and compassionate-use experience from 8 countries, 52 patients with rapidly growing mycobacterial infections (most frequently
M. abscessus lung disease) were treated with tigecycline, along with other antibiotics. The mean and median durations of treatment were approximately 5½ and 3 months, respectively (range: 3 days to approximately 3½ years). Approximately half of the patients achieved clinical improvement (ie, improvement in signs and symptoms of lung disease, or healing of wound, skin lesions or nodules in disseminated disease). Approximately half of the patients required dose reductions or discontinued treatment due to nausea, vomiting or anorexia.
Pharmacokinetics: The mean pharmacokinetic parameters of tigecycline for this dosage regimen after single and multiple IV doses are summarized in Table 12.
IV infusions of tigecycline should be administered over approximately 30-60 min. (See Table 12.)
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
Absorption: Tigecycline is administered IV and therefore has 100% bioavailability.
Distribution: The
in vitro plasma protein-binding of tigecycline ranges from approximately 71-89% at concentrations observed in clinical studies (0.1-1 mcg/mL). Animal and human pharmacokinetic studies have demonstrated that tigecycline readily distributes to tissues. In rats receiving a single or multiple doses of
14C-tigecycline, radioactivity was well distributed to most tissues, with the highest overall exposure observed in bone, bone marrow, salivary glands, thyroid gland, spleen and kidney. In humans, the steady-state volume of distribution of tigecycline averaged 500-700 L (7-9 L/kg), indicating that tigecycline is extensively distributed beyond the plasma volume and into the tissues of humans.
Two studies examined the steady-state pharmacokinetic profile of tigecycline in specific tissues or fluids of healthy subjects receiving tigecycline 100 mg followed by 50 mg every 12 hrs. In a bronchoalveolar lavage study, the tigecycline AUC
0-12 hrs (134 mcg·hr/mL) in alveolar cells was approximately 77.5-fold higher than the AUC
0-12 hrs in the serum of these subjects and the AUC
0-12 hrs (2.28 mcg·hr/mL) in epithelial lining fluid was approximately 32% higher than the AUC
0-12 hrs in serum. In a skin blister study, the AUC
0-12 hrs (1.61 mcg·hr/mL) of tigecycline in skin blister fluid was approximately 26% lower than the AUC
0-12 hrs in the serum of these subjects.
In a single-dose study, tigecycline 100 mg was administered to subjects prior to undergoing elective surgery or medical procedure for tissue extraction. Tissue concentrations at 4 hrs after tigecycline administration were measured in the following tissue and fluid samples: Gallbladder, lung, colon, synovial fluid and bone. Tigecycline attained higher concentrations in tissues versus serum in gallbladder (38-fold, n=6), lung (3.7-fold, n=5) and colon (2.3-fold, n=6). The concentration of tigecycline in these tissues after multiple doses has not been studied.
Metabolism: Tigecycline is not extensively metabolized.
In vitro studies with tigecycline using human liver microsomes, liver slices and hepatocytes led to the formation of only trace amounts of metabolites. In healthy male volunteers following the administration of
14C-tigecycline, tigecycline was the primary
14C-labeled material recovered in urine and faeces, but a glucuronide, an N-acetyl metabolite and a tigecycline epimer (each at no more than 10% of the administered dose) were also present.
Elimination: The recovery of the total radioactivity in faeces and urine following administration of
14C-tigecycline indicates that 59% of the dose is eliminated by biliary/faecal excretion and 33% is excreted in urine. Overall, the primary route of elimination for tigecycline is biliary excretion of unchanged tigecycline. Glucuronidation and renal excretion of unchanged tigecycline are secondary routes.
Special Populations: Hepatic Insufficiency: In a study comparing 10 patients with mild hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh A), 10 patients with moderate hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh B) and 5 patients with severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh C) to 23 age- and weight-matched healthy control subjects, the single-dose pharmacokinetic disposition of tigecycline was not altered in patients with mild hepatic impairment. However, systemic clearance of tigecycline was reduced by 25% and the half-life of tigecycline was prolonged by 23% in patients with moderate hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh B). In addition, systemic clearance of tigecycline was reduced by 55% and the half-life of tigecycline was prolonged by 43% in patients with severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh C).
Based on the pharmacokinetic profile of tigecycline, no dosage adjustment is warranted in patients with mild to moderate hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh A and B). However, in patients with severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh C), the dose of Tygacil should be altered to 100 mg followed by 25 mg every 12 hrs. Patients with severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh C) should be treated with caution and monitored for treatment response (see Hepatic Insufficiency under Dosage & Administration).
Renal Insufficiency: A single-dose study compared 6 subjects with severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance ≤30 mL/min), 4 end-stage renal dialysis patients receiving tigecycline 2 hrs before haemodialysis, 4 end-stage renal dialysis patients receiving tigecycline after haemodialysis and 6 healthy control subjects. The pharmacokinetic profile of tigecycline was not altered in any of the renally impaired patient groups, nor was tigecycline removed by haemodialysis. No dosage adjustment of tigecycline is necessary in patients with renal impairment or in patients undergoing haemodialysis (see Renal Insufficiency under Dosage & Administration).
Elderly Patients: No overall differences in pharmacokinetics were observed between healthy elderly subjects and younger subjects. Therefore, no dosage adjustment is necessary based on age.
Paediatric Patients: The pharmacokinetics of tigecycline in patients <18 years has not been established.
Gender: There were no differences in the clearance of tigecycline between men and women. Therefore, no dosage adjustment is necessary based on gender.
Race: There were no differences in the clearance of tigecycline based on race.