Pharmacotherapeutic Group: Antineoplastic agent, Protein Kinase inhibitor.
ATC Code: L01XE36.
Pharmacology: Pharmacodynamics: Mechanism of Action: Alectinib is a highly selective and potent ALK and RET tyrosine kinase inhibitor. In nonclinical studies, inhibition of ALK tyrosine kinase activity led to blockage of downstream signalling pathways including STAT 3 and PI3K/AKT and induces tumor cell death (apoptosis).
Alectinib demonstrated
in vitro and
in vivo activity against mutant forms of the ALK enzyme, including mutations responsible for resistance to crizotinib. The major metabolite of alectinib (M4) has shown similar
in vitro potency and activity.
Based on nonclinical data, alectinib is not a substrate of p-glycoprotein (P-gp) or Breast Cancer Resistance Protein (BCRP), which are both efflux transporters in the blood brain barrier, and is therefore able to distribute into and be retained within the central nervous system. Alectinib induced tumor regression in preclinical mouse xenograft models, including antitumor activity in the brain, and prolonged survival in intracranial tumor animal models.
Clinical/Efficacy Studies: ALK positive non-small cell lung cancer: Treatment-naïve patients: The safety and efficacy of Alecensa were studied in a global randomized Phase III open label clinical trial (BO28984) in ALK-positive NSCLC patients who were treatment naïve [39, 40]. Central testing for ALK protein expression positivity of tissue samples from all patients by Ventana anti-ALK (D5F3) immunohistochemistry (IHC) was required before randomization into the study.
A total of 303 patients were included in the Phase III trial, 151 patients randomized to the crizotinib arm and 152 patients randomized to the Alecensa arm receiving Alecensa orally, at the recommended dose of 600 mg twice daily.
ECOG PS (0/1 vs. 2), race (Asian vs. non-Asian), and CNS metastases at baseline (yes vs. no) were stratification factors for randomization. The primary endpoint of the trial was to demonstrate superiority of Alecensa versus crizotinib based on Progression Free survival (PFS) as per investigator assessment using RECIST 1.1. Baseline demographic and disease characteristics for Alecensa were median age 58 years (54 years for crizotinib) , 55% female (58% for crizotinib), 55% non-Asian (54% for crizotinib), 61% with no smoking history (65% for crizotinib), 93% ECOG PS of 0 or 1 (93% for crizotinib), 97% Stage IV disease (96% for crizotinib), 90% adenocarcinoma histology (94% for crizotinib), 40% CNS metastases at baseline (38% for crizotinib) and 17% having received prior CNS radiation (14% for crizotinib).
The trial met its primary endpoint at the primary analysis. Efficacy data are summarized in Table 1 and the Kaplan-Meier curves for investigator and IRC-assessed PFS are shown in Figures 1 and 2. (See Table 1.)
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
The magnitude of PFS benefit was consistent for patients with CNS metastases at baseline (HR=0.40, 95%CI: 0.25-0.64, median PFS for Alecensa = NE, 95% CI: 9.2-NE, median PFS for crizotinib = 7.4 months, 95%CI: 6.6-9.6) and without CNS metastases at baseline (HR = 0.51, 95%CI: 0.33-0.80, median PFS for Alecensa = NE, 95% CI: NE, NE, median PFS for crizotinib = 14.8 months, 95% CI:10.8-20.3), indicating benefit of Alecensa over crizotinib in both subgroups. (See Figure 1 and 2.)
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
Crizotinib pre-treated patients: The safety and efficacy of Alecensa in ALK-positive NSCLC patients pre-treated with crizotinib were studied in two Phase I/II clinical trials (NP28761 and NP28673).
Study NP28761 was a Phase I/II single arm, multicenter study conducted in patients with ALK positive advanced NSCLC who have previously progressed on crizotinib treatment. In addition to crizotinib, patients may have received previous treatment with chemotherapy. A total of 87 patients were included in the phase II part of the study and received Alecensa orally, at the recommended dose of 600 mg twice daily.
The primary endpoint was to evaluate the efficacy of Alecensa by Objective Response Rate (ORR) as per central Independent Review Committee (IRC) assessment using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1.
Patient demographics were consistent with that of a NSCLC ALK positive population. The demographic characteristics of the overall study population were 84% Caucasian, 8% Asian, 55% females and a median age of 54 years. The majority of patients had no history of smoking (62%). The ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance status at baseline was 0 or 1 in 90% of patients and 2 in 10% of patients. At the time of entry in the study, 99% of patients had stage IV disease, 60% had brain metastases and in 94% of patients tumors were classified as adenocarcinoma. Among patients included in the study, 26% had previously progressed on crizotinib treatment only, and 74% had previously progressed on crizotinib and chemotherapy treatment. (See Table 2.)
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
As shown in the waterfall plot in Figure 3, most patients experienced tumour shrinkage of their defined target lesions, as assessed by the IRC according to RECIST 1.1. (See Figure 3.)
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
Quality of life (QoL): Of the QoL items analysed (QLQ-C30 and QLQ-LC13), clinically meaningful improvements (change from baseline of ≥10 points) were observed in the Global Health Status, Emotional Functioning, Social Functioning, Fatigue, and Pain subscales.
Study NP28673 was a Phase I/II single arm, international, multicenter study conducted in patients with ALK-positive advanced NSCLC who have previously progressed on crizotinib. In addition to crizotinib, patients may have received previous treatment with chemotherapy. A total of 138 patients were included in the phase II part of the study and received Alecensa orally, at the recommended dose of 600 mg twice daily.
The primary endpoint was to evaluate the efficacy of Alecensa by ORR as per central IRC assessment using RECIST 1.1 in the overall population (with and without prior exposure of cytotoxic chemotherapy treatments). The co-primary endpoint was to evaluate the ORR as per central IRC assessment using RECIST 1.1 in patients with prior exposure of cytotoxic chemotherapy treatments.
Patient demographics were consistent with that of a NSCLC ALK positive population. The demographic characteristics of the overall study population were 67% Caucasian, 26% Asian, 56% females and the median age was 52 years. The majority of patients had no history of smoking (70%). The ECOG performance status in patients at baseline was 0 or 1 in 91% of patients and 2 in 9% of patients. At the time of entry in the study, 99% of patients had stage IV disease, 61% had brain metastases and in 96% of patient tumors were classified as adenocarcinoma. Among patients included in the study, 20% had previously progressed on crizotinib treatment only, and 80% had previously progressed on crizotinib and chemotherapy treatment. (See Table 3.)
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
As shown in the waterfall plot in Figure 4, most patients experienced tumour shrinkage of their defined target lesions, as assessed by the IRC according to RECIST 1.1. (See Figure 4.)
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
A summary of the pooled analysis of the Central Nervous System (CNS) endpoints based on RECIST (IRC) performed on patients with measurable CNS lesions at baseline (N=50) included in the phase II NP28761 and NP28673 is presented in the below table. (See Table 4.)
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
In 136 patients included in the phase II NP28761 and NP28673 with measurable and/or non-measurable CNS lesions at baseline, the CNS complete response rate was 28.7%. A CNS partial response cannot be established in non-measurable CNS lesions per RECIST. The CNS disease control rate was 86.0% [95% CI (79.1, 91.4)].
Immunogenicity: Not applicable.
Pharmacokinetics: The pharmacokinetic parameters for alectinib and its major active metabolite (M4), have been characterized in ALK-positive NSCLC patients and healthy subjects. The geometric mean (coefficient of variation %) steady-state C
max, C
min and AUC
0-12hr for alectinib were approximately 665 ng/mL (44.3%), 572 ng/mL (47.8 %) and 7430 ng*h/mL (45.7 %), respectively. The geometric mean steady-state C
max, C
min and AUC
0-12hr for M4 were approximately 246 ng/mL (45.4 %), 222 ng/mL (46.6 %) and 2810 ng*h/mL (45.9 %), respectively.
Absorption: Following oral administration of 600 mg twice daily under fed conditions in ALK-positive NSCLC patients, alectinib was rapidly absorbed reaching T
max after approximately 4 to 6 hours.
Alectinib steady-state is reached by Day 7 with continuous 600 mg twice daily dosing and remains stable thereafter. The geometric mean accumulation ratio estimated by population PK analysis for the twice-daily 600 mg regimen is 5.6. Population PK analysis supports dose proportionality for alectinib across the dose range of 300 to 900 mg under fed conditions.
The absolute bioavailability of alectinib was 36.9% (90% CI: 33.9%, 40.3%) under fed conditions in healthy subjects.
Following a single oral administration of 600 mg with a high-fat, high-calorie meal, exposure increased by 3-fold relative to fasted conditions (geometric mean ratio [90% CI] of combined alectinib and M4: Cmax: 3.31 [2.79-3.93], AUCinf: 3.11 [2.73-3.55].
Distribution: Alectinib and its major metabolite M4 are highly bound to human plasma proteins (>99%), independent of drug concentration. The mean
in vitro human blood-to-plasma concentration ratios of alectinib and M4 are 2.64 and 2.50, respectively, at clinically relevant concentrations.
The geometric mean volume of distribution at steady state (V
ss) of alectinib following IV administration was 475 L, indicating extensive distribution into tissues.
Metabolism: In vitro metabolism studies showed that CYP3A4 is the main CYP isozyme mediating alectinib and its major metabolite M4 metabolism, and is estimated to contribute 40-50% of alectinib metabolism in human hepatocytes. Results from the human mass balance study demonstrated that alectinib and M4 were the main circulating moieties in plasma with alectinib and M4 together constituting approximately 76% of the total radioactivity in plasma. The geometric mean Metabolite/Parent ratio at steady state is 0.399.
Elimination: Following administration of a single dose of
14C-labeled alectinib administered orally to healthy subjects the majority of radioactivity was excreted in feces (mean recovery 97.8%, range 95.6%-100%) with minimal excretion in urine (mean recovery 0.46%, range 0.30%-0.60%). In feces, 84% and 5.8% of the dose was excreted as unchanged alectinib or M4, respectively.
Based on a population PK analysis, the apparent clearance (CL/F) of alectinib was 81.9 L/hour. The geometric mean of the individual elimination half-life estimates for alectinib was 32.5 hours. The corresponding values for M4 were 217 L/hour and 30.7 hours, respectively.
Special Populations: Pediatric population: No studies have been conducted to investigate the pharmacokinetics of Alecensa in this population.
Geriatric population: Age does not have an effect on Alecensa exposure.
Renal impairment: Negligible amounts of alectinib and the active metabolite M4 are excreted unchanged in urine (< 0.2 % of the dose). Data obtained in patients with mild and moderate renal impairment show that the pharmacokinetics of alectinib are not significantly affected in renal impairment. No formal pharmacokinetic study has been conducted and no population PK data was collected in patients with severe renal impairment, however since alectinib elimination via the kidney is negligible no dose adjustment is required in renal impairment.
Hepatic impairment: As elimination of alectinib is predominantly through metabolism in the liver, hepatic impairment may increase the plasma concentration of alectinib and/or its major active metabolite M4. Based on a population pharmacokinetic analysis, alectinib and M4 exposures were similar in patients with mild hepatic impairment (baseline total bilirubin less than or equal to ULN and baseline AST greater than ULN or baseline total bilirubin greater than 1.0 to 1.5 times ULN and any baseline AST) and normal hepatic function (total bilirubin less than or equal to ULN and AST less than or equal to ULN).
Following administration of a single oral dose of 300 mg alectinib in subjects with moderate (Child-Pugh B) hepatic impairment the combined exposure of alectinib and M4 was modestly increased compared with matched healthy subjects (geometric mean ratio [90% confidence interval] for moderate/healthy: C
max: 1.16 [0.786 – 1.72], AUC
inf: 1.36 [0.947 – 1.96]). Administration of a single oral dose of 300 mg alectinib in subjects with severe (Child-Pugh C) hepatic impairment resulted in a greater increase in the combined exposure of alectinib and M4 compared with matched healthy subjects (geometric mean ratio [90% confidence interval] for severe/healthy: C
max: 0.981 [0.517 – 1.86], AUC
inf: 1.76 [0.984 – 3.15]).
No dose adjustments are required for Alecensa in patients with underlying mild or moderate hepatic impairment. Patients with underlying severe hepatic impairment should receive a dose of 450 mg given orally twice daily (total daily dose of 900 mg).
Toxicity: Non-clinical Safety: Carcinogenicity: No carcinogenicity studies have been performed to establish the carcinogenic potential of Alecensa.
Genotoxicity: Alectinib was not mutagenic
in vitro in the bacterial reverse mutation (Ames) assay but induced a slight increase in numerical aberrations in the
in vitro cytogenetic assay using Chinese Hamster Lung (CHL) cells with metabolic activation, and micronuclei in a rat bone marrow micronucleus test. The mechanism of micronucleus induction was abnormal chromosome segregation (aneugenicity), and not a clastogenic effect on chromosomes.
Impairment of Fertility: No fertility studies in animals have been performed to evaluate the effect of Alecensa. No adverse effects on male and female reproductive organs were observed in general toxicology studies conducted in rats and monkeys at exposures equal to or greater than 2.6 and 0.5 fold, respectively, of the human exposure measured by AUC at the recommended dose of 600 mg twice daily.
Reproductive Toxicity: In animal studies, a maternal dose of alectinib equivalent to 2.7-times the recommended human dose of 600 mg twice-daily (based on AUC), caused embryo-fetal loss (miscarriage) in pregnant rabbits. The same equivalent dose given to pregnant rats resulted in small fetuses with retarded ossification and minor abnormalities of the organs.
Other: Alectinib absorbs UV light between 200 and 400 nm and demonstrated phototoxic potential in an
in vitro photosafety test in cultured murine fibroblasts after UVA irradiation.
Target organs in both rat and monkey at clinically relevant exposures in the repeat-dose toxicology studies included, but were not limited to the erythroid system, gastrointestinal tract and hepatobiliary system.
Abnormal erythrocyte morphology was observed at exposures equal or greater than 10-60% the human exposure by AUC at the recommended dose. Proliferative zone extension in GI mucosa in both species was observed at exposures equal to or greater than 20-120% of the human AUC exposure at the recommended dose. Increased hepatic alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and direct bilirubin as well as vacuolation/degeneration/necrosis of bile duct epithelium and enlargement/focal necrosis of hepatocytes was observed in rats and/or monkeys at exposures equal to or greater than 20-30% of the human exposure by AUC at the recommended dose.
A mild hypotensive effect has been observed in monkeys at around clinically relevant exposures.
Alectinib crossed the blood brain barrier in rats and was retained within brain tissue with a CNS-to-plasma radio-concentration ratio ranging from 0.9 to 1.5 at 24 hrs post-dose.