Darzalex

Each mL contains 20 mg daratumumab.
5 mL vial: Each single-use vial contains 100 mg of daratumumab.
20 mL vial: Each single-use vial contains 400 mg of daratumumab.
Daratumumab is an immunoglobulin G1 kappa (IgG1κ) human monoclonal antibody against CD38 antigen, produced in a mammalian cell line (Chinese Hamster Ovary [CHO]) using recombinant DNA technology.
Excipients/Inactive Ingredients: Glacial acetic acid, Mannitol, Polysorbate 20, Sodium acetate trihydrate, Sodium chloride, Water for injection.

Pharmacotherapeutic group: Antineoplastic agents, monoclonal antibodies. ATC code: L01FC01.
Pharmacology: Pharmacodynamics: Mechanism of action: Daratumumab is an IgG1κ human monoclonal antibody (mAb) that binds to the CD38 protein expressed at a high level on the surface of cells in a variety of hematological malignancies, including multiple myeloma tumor cells, as well as other cell types and tissues at various levels. CD38 protein has multiple functions such as receptor mediated adhesion, signaling and enzymatic activity.
Daratumumab has been shown to potently inhibit the in vivo growth of CD38-expressing tumor cells. Based on in vitro studies, daratumumab may utilize multiple effector functions, resulting in immune mediated tumor cell death. These studies suggest that daratumumab can induce tumor cell lysis through complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC), antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC), and antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP) in malignancies expressing CD38. A subset of myeloid derived suppressor cells (CD38+MDSCs), regulatory T cells (CD38+T_regs) and B cells (CD38+B_regs) are decreased by daratumumab. T cells (CD3+, CD4+, and CD8+) are also known to express CD38 depending on the stage of development and the level of activation. Significant increases in CD4+ and CD8+ T cell absolute counts, and percentages of lymphocytes, were observed with DARZALEX treatment in peripheral whole blood and bone marrow. T-cell receptor DNA sequencing verified that T-cell clonality was increased with DARZALEX treatment, indicating immune modulatory effects that may contribute to clinical response.
Daratumumab induced apoptosis in vitro after Fc mediated cross-linking. In addition, daratumumab modulated CD38 enzymatic activity, inhibiting the cyclase enzyme activity and stimulating the hydrolase activity. The significance of these in vitro effects in a clinical setting, and the implications on tumor growth, are not well-understood.
Pharmacodynamic effects: Natural killer (NK) cell and T-cell count: NK cells are known to express high levels of CD38 and are susceptible to daratumumab mediated cell lysis. Decreases in absolute counts and percentages of total NK cells (CD16+CD56+) and activated (CD16+CD56^dim) NK cells in peripheral whole blood and bone marrow were observed with DARZALEX treatment. However, baseline levels of NK cells did not show an association with clinical response.
Immunogenicity: In multiple myeloma patients treated with DARZALEX in monotherapy and combination clinical trials, less than 1% of patients developed treatment-emergent anti-daratumumab antibodies.
Immunogenicity data are highly dependent on the sensitivity and specificity of the test methods used. Additionally, the observed incidence of a positive result in a test method may be influenced by several factors, including sample handling, timing of sample collection, drug interference, concomitant medication and the underlying disease. Therefore, comparison of the incidence of antibodies to daratumumab with the incidence of antibodies to other products may be misleading.
Clinical studies: Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: Combination treatment with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients ineligible for autologous stem cell transplant: Study MMY3008 an open-label, randomized, active-controlled Phase 3 study, compared treatment with DARZALEX 16 mg/kg in combination with lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone (DRd) to treatment with lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone (Rd) in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Lenalidomide (25 mg once daily orally on Days 1-21 of repeated 28-day [4-week] cycles) was given with low dose oral or intravenous dexamethasone 40 mg/week (or a reduced dose of 20 mg/week for patients >75 years or body mass index [BMI] <18.5). On DARZALEX infusion days, the dexamethasone dose was given as a pre-infusion medication. Dose adjustments for lenalidomide and dexamethasone were applied according to manufacturer's prescribing information. Treatment was continued in both arms until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
A total of 737 patients were randomized: 368 to the DRd arm and 369 to the Rd arm. The baseline demographic and disease characteristics were similar between the two treatment groups. The median age was 73 (range: 45-90) years, with 44% of the patients ≥75 years of age. The majority were white (92%), male (52%), 34% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score of 0, 50% had an ECOG performance score of 1 and 17% had an ECOG performance score of ≥2. Twenty-seven percent had International Staging System (ISS) Stage I, 43% had ISS Stage II and 29% had ISS Stage III disease. Efficacy was evaluated by progression free survival (PFS) based on International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria and overall survival (OS).
With a median follow-up of 28 months, the primary analysis of PFS in study MMY3008 demonstrated an improvement in the DRd arm as compared to the Rd arm; the median PFS had not been reached in the DRd arm and was 31.9 months in the Rd arm (hazard ratio [HR]=0.56; 95% CI: 0.43, 0.73; p<0.0001), representing 44% reduction in the risk of disease progression or death in patients treated with DRd. Results of an updated PFS analysis after a median follow-up of 64 months continued to show an improvement in PFS for patients in the DRd arm compared with the Rd am. Median PFS was 61.9 months in the DRd arm and 34.4 months in the Rd arm (HR=0.55; 95% CI: 0.45, 0.67; p<0.0001), representing a 45% reduction in the risk of disease progression or death in patients treated with DRd. (See Figure 1.)

Click on icon to see table/diagram/image

After a median follow-up of 56 months, DRd has shown an OS advantage over the Rd arm (HR=0.68; 95% CI: 0.53, 0.86; p=0.0013), representing a 32% reduction in the risk of death in patients treated in the DRd arm. Median OS was not reached for either arm. The 60 month survival rate was 66% (95% CI: 61, 71) in the DRd arm and was 53% (95% CI: 47, 59) in the Rd arm. (See Figure 2.)

Click on icon to see table/diagram/image

Additional efficacy results from Study MMY3008 are presented in the table as follows. (See Table 1.)

Click on icon to see table/diagram/image

In responders, the median time to response was 1.05 months (range: 0.2 to 12.1 months) in the DRd group and 1.05 months (range: 0.3 to 15.3 months) in the Rd group. The median duration of response had not been reached in the DRd group and was 34.7 months (95% CI: 30.8, not estimable) in the Rd group.
Combination treatment with bortezomib, melphalan and prednisone (VMP) in patients ineligible for autologous stem cell transplant: Study MMY3007, an open-label, randomized, active-controlled Phase 3 study, compared treatment with DARZALEX 16 mg/kg in combination with bortezomib, melphalan and prednisone (D-VMP), to treatment with VMP in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Bortezomib was administered by subcutaneous (SC) injection at a dose of 1.3 mg/m² body surface area twice weekly at Weeks 1, 2, 4 and 5 for the first 6-week cycle (Cycle 1; 8 doses), followed by once weekly administrations at Weeks 1, 2, 4 and 5 for eight more 6-week cycles (Cycles 2-9; 4 doses per cycle). Melphalan at 9 mg/m², and prednisone at 60 mg/m² were orally administered on Days 1 to 4 of the nine 6-week cycles (Cycles 1-9). DARZALEX treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
A total of 706 patients were randomized: 350 to the D-VMP arm and 356 to the VMP arm. The baseline demographic and disease characteristics were similar between the two treatment groups. The median age was 71 (range: 40-93) years, with 30% of the patients ≥75 years of age. The majority were white (85%), female (54%), 25% had an ECOG performance score of 0, 50% had an ECOG performance score of 1 and 25% had an ECOG performance score of 2. Patients had IgG/IgA/Light chain myeloma in 64%/22%/10% of instances, 19% had ISS Stage I, 42% had ISS Stage II and 38% had ISS Stage III disease. Efficacy was evaluated by PFS based on IMWG criteria and overall survival (OS).
With a median follow-up of 16.5 months, the primary analysis of PFS in study MMY3007 demonstrated an improvement in the D-VMP arm as compared to the VMP arm; the median PFS had not been reached in the D-VMP arm and was 18.1 months in the VMP arm (HR=0.5; 95% CI: 0.38, 0.65; p<0.0001), representing 50% reduction in the risk of disease progression or death in patients treated with D-VMP. Results of an updated PFS analysis after a median follow-up of 40 months continued to show an improvement in PFS for patients in the D VMP arm compared with the VMP arm. Median PFS was 36.4 months in the D-VMP arm and 19.3 months in the VMP arm (HR=0.42; 95% CI: 0.34, 0.51; p<0.0001), representing a 58% reduction in the risk of disease progression or death in patients treated with D-VMP. (See Figure 3.)

Click on icon to see table/diagram/image

After a median follow-up of 40 months, D-VMP has shown an overall survival (OS) advantage over the VMP arm (HR=0.60; 95% CI: 0.46, 0.80; p=0.0003), representing a 40% reduction in the risk of death in patients treated in the D-VMP arm. Median OS was not reached for either arm. (See Figure 4.)

Click on icon to see table/diagram/image

Additional efficacy results from Study MMY3007 are presented in the table as follows. (See Table 2.)

Click on icon to see table/diagram/image

In responders, the median time to response was 0.79 months (range: 0.4 to 15.5 months) in the D-VMP group and 0.82 months (range: 0.7 to 12.6 months) in the VMP group. The median duration of response had not been reached in the D-VMP group and was 21.3 months (range: 18.4, not estimable) in the VMP group.
Combination with bortezomib, thalidomide and dexamethasone in patients eligible for autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT): Study MMY3006, an open-label, randomized, active-controlled Phase 3 study compared induction and consolidation treatment with DARZALEX 16 mg/kg in combination with bortezomib, thalidomide and dexamethasone (DVTd) to treatment with bortezomib, thalidomide and dexamethasone (VTd) in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma eligible for ASCT. The consolidation phase of treatment began a minimum of 30 days post-ASCT, when the patient had recovered sufficiently, and engraftment was complete.
Bortezomib was administered by subcutaneous (SC) injection or intravenous (IV) injection at a dose of 1.3 mg/m² body surface area twice weekly for two weeks (Days 1, 4, 8, and 11) of repeated 28-day (4-week) induction treatment cycles (Cycles 1-4) and two consolidation cycles (Cycles 5 and 6) following ASCT after Cycle 4. Thalidomide was administered orally at 100 mg daily during the six bortezomib cycles. Dexamethasone (oral or intravenous) was administered at 40 mg on Days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16, 22 and 23 of Cycles 1 and 2, and at 40 mg on Days 1-2 and 20 mg on subsequent dosing days (Days 8, 9, 15, 16) of Cycles 3-4. Dexamethasone 20 mg was administered on Days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16 in Cycles 5 and 6. On the days of DARZALEX infusion, the dexamethasone dose was administered intravenously as a pre-infusion medication. Dose adjustments for bortezomib, thalidomide and dexamethasone were applied according to manufacturer's prescribing information.
A total of 1085 patients were randomized: 543 to the DVTd arm and 542 to the VTd arm. The baseline demographic and disease characteristics were similar between the two treatment groups. The median age was 58 (range: 22 to 65 years). The majority were male (59%), 48% had an ECOG performance score of 0, 42% had an ECOG performance score of 1 and 10% had an ECOG performance score of 2. Forty percent had ISS Stage I, 45% had ISS Stage II and 15% had ISS Stage III disease.
Efficacy was evaluated by the stringent Complete Response (sCR) rate at Day 100 post-transplant. (See Table 3.)

Click on icon to see table/diagram/image

With a median follow-up of 18.8 months, the primary analysis of PFS in study MMY3006 demonstrated an improvement in PFS in the DVTd arm as compared to the VTd arm; the median PFS had not been reached in either arm. Treatment with DVTd resulted in a reduction in the risk of progression or death by 53% compared to VTd alone (HR=0.47; 95% CI: 0.33, 0.67; p<0.0001). Results of an updated PFS analysis after a median follow-up of 44.5 months continued to show an improvement in PFS for patients in the DVTd arm compared with the VTd arm. Median PFS was not reached in the DVTd arm and was 51.5 months in the VTd arm (HR=0.58; 95% CI: 0.47, 0.71; p<0.0001), representing a 42% reduction in the risk of disease progression or death in patients treated with DVTd. (See Figure 5.)

Click on icon to see table/diagram/image

Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Combination treatment with lenalidomide and dexamethasone: Study MMY3003, an open-label, randomized, active-controlled Phase 3 trial, compared treatment with DARZALEX 16 mg/kg in combination with lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone (DRd) to treatment with lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone (Rd) in patients with multiple myeloma who had received at least one prior therapy. Lenalidomide (25 mg once daily orally on Days 1-21 of repeated 28-day [4-week] cycles) was given with low dose oral or intravenous dexamethasone 40 mg/week (or a reduced dose of 20 mg/week for patients >75 years or BMI <18.5). On DARZALEX infusion days, 20 mg of the dexamethasone dose was given as a pre-infusion medication and the remainder given the day after the infusion. For patients on a reduced dexamethasone dose, the entire 20 mg dose was given as a DARZALEX pre-infusion medication. Dose adjustments for lenalidomide and dexamethasone were applied according to manufacturer's prescribing information. Treatment was continued in both arms until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
A total of 569 patients were randomized; 286 to the DRd arm and 283 to the Rd arm. The baseline demographic and disease characteristics were similar between the DARZALEX and the control arm. The median patient age was 65 years (range 34 to 89 years), 11% were ≥ 75 years, 59% were male; 69% Caucasian, 18% Asian, and 3% African American. Patients had received a median of 1 prior line of therapy. Sixty -three percent (63%) of patients had received prior autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). The majority of patients (86%) received a prior proteasome inhibitor (PI), 55% of patients had received a prior immunomodulatory agent (IMiD), including 18% of patients who had received prior lenalidomide, and 44% of patients had received both a prior PI and IMiD. At baseline, 27% of patients were refractory to the last line of treatment. Eighteen percent (18%) of patients were refractory to a PI only, and 21% were refractory to bortezomib. Efficacy was evaluated by PFS based on IMWG criteria and overall survival (OS).
With a median follow-up of 13.5 months, the primary analysis of PFS in study MMY3003 demonstrated an improvement in the DRd arm as compared to the Rd arm; the median PFS had not been reached in the DRd arm and was 18.4 months in the Rd arm (HR=0.37; 95% CI: 0.27, 0.52; p<0.0001) representing 63% reduction in the risk of disease progression or death in patients treated with DRd. Results of an updated PFS analysis after a median follow-up of 55 months continued to show an improvement in PFS for patients in the DRd arm compared with the Rd arm. Median PFS was 45.0 months in the DRd arm and 17.5 months in the Rd arm (HR=0.44; 95% CI: 0.35, 0.54; p<0.0001), representing a 56% reduction in the risk of disease progression or death in patients treated with DRd. (See Figure 6.)

Click on icon to see table/diagram/image

After a median follow-up of 80 months, DRd has shown an OS advantage over the Rd arm (HR=0.73; 95% CI: 0058, 0.91; p=0.0044), representing a 27% reduction in the risk of death in patients treated in the DRd arm. The median OS was 67.6 months in the DRd arm and 51.8 months in the Rd arm. The 78-month survival rate was 47% (95% CI: 41, 52) in the DRd arm and was 35% (95% CI: 30, 41) in the Rd arm. (See Figure 7.)

Click on icon to see table/diagram/image

Additional efficacy results from Study MMY3003 are presented in the table as follows. (See Table 4.)

Click on icon to see table/diagram/image

Combination treatment with bortezomib and dexamethasone: Study MMY3004, an open-label, randomized, active-controlled Phase 3 trial, compared treatment with DARZALEX 16 mg/kg in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone (DVd), to treatment with bortezomib and dexamethasone (Vd) in patients with multiple myeloma who had received at least one prior therapy. Bortezomib was administered by SC injection or IV injection at a dose of 1.3 mg/m² body surface area twice weekly for two weeks (Days 1, 4, 8, and 11) of repeated 21 day (3-week) treatment cycles, for a total of 8 cycles. Dexamethasone was administered orally at a dose of 20 mg on Days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, and 12 of the 8 bortezomib cycles (80 mg/week for two out of three weeks of each of the bortezomib cycle) or a reduced dose of 20 mg/week for patients >75 years, BMI <18.5, poorly controlled diabetes mellitus or prior intolerance to steroid therapy. On the days of DARZALEX infusion, 20 mg of the dexamethasone dose was administered as a pre-infusion medication. For patients on a reduced dexamethasone dose, the entire 20 mg dose was given as a DARZALEX pre-infusion medication. Bortezomib and dexamethasone were given for 8 three-week cycles in both treatment arms; whereas DARZALEX was given until treatment progression. However, dexamethasone 20 mg was continued as a DARZALEX pre-infusion medication in the DVd arm. Dose adjustments for bortezomib and dexamethasone were applied according to manufacturer's prescribing information.
A total of 498 patients were randomized; 251 to the DVd arm and 247 to the Vd arm. The baseline demographic and disease characteristics were similar between the DARZALEX and the control arm. The median patient age was 64 years (range 30 to 88 years); 12% were ≥ 75 years, 57% were male; 87% Caucasian, 5% Asian and 4% African American. Patients had received a median of 2 prior lines of therapy and 61% of patients had received prior autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Sixty-nine percent (69%) of patients had received a prior PI (66% received bortezomib) and 76% of patients received an IMiD (42% received lenalidomide). At baseline, 32% of patients were refractory to the last line of treatment and the proportions of patients refractory to any specific prior therapy were well balanced between the treatment groups. Thirty-three percent (33%) of patients were refractory to an IMiD only, and 28% were refractory to lenalidomide. Efficacy was evaluated by PFS based on IMWG criteria and overall survival (OS).
With a median follow-up of 7.4 months, the primary analysis of PFS in study MMY3004 demonstrated an improvement in the DVd arm as compared to the Vd arm; the median PFS had not been reached in the DVd arm and was 7.2 months in the Vd arm (HR [95% CI]: 0.39 [0.28, 0.53]; p-value < 0.0001), representing a 61% reduction in the risk of disease progression or death for patients treated with DVd versus Vd. Results of an updated PFS analysis after a median follow-up of 50 months continued to show an improvement in PFS for patients in the DVd arm compared with the Vd arm. Median PFS was 16.7 months in the DVd arm and 7.1 months in the Vd arm (HR [95% CI]: 0.31 [0.24, 0.39]; p-value < 0.0001), representing a 69% reduction in the risk of disease progression or death in patients treated with DVd versus Vd. (See Figure 8.)

Click on icon to see table/diagram/image

After a median follow-up of 73 months, DVd has shown as OS advantage over the Vd arm (HR=0.74; 95% CI: 0.59, 0.92; p=0.0075), representing a 26% reduction in the risk of death in patients treated in the DVd arm. The median OS was 49.6 months in the DVd arm and 38.5 months in the Vd arm. The 72-month survival rate was 39% (95% CI: 33, 45) in the DVd arm and was 25% (95% CI: 20, 31) in the Vd arm. (See Figure 9.)

Click on icon to see table/diagram/image

Additional efficacy results from Study MMY3004 are presented in the table as follows. (See Table 5.)

Click on icon to see table/diagram/image

Combination treatment with twice-weekly (20/56 mg/m²) carfilzomib and dexamethasone: Study 20160275, an open-label, randomized, active-controlled Phase 3 trial, compared treatment with DARZALEX 16 mg/kg in combination with carfilzomib and dexamethasone (DKd) to treatment with carfilzomib and dexamethasone (Kd) in patients with multiple myeloma who had received at least one to three prior lines of therapy.
Carfilzomib was administered as IV infusion twice weekly on Days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16 of repeated 28-day [4-week] treatment cycles. Carfilzomib dose was 20 mg/m² on Cycle 1 Days 1 and 2 and 56 mg/m² beginning on Cycle 1 Day 8 and thereafter.
Dexamethasone was administered orally or by IV infusion at a dose of 40 mg weekly. Dexamethasone was administered as an IV infusion on carfilzomib and/or DARZALEX IV infusion days. On the days of DARZALEX and/or carfilzomib infusion, 20 mg of the dexamethasone dose was administered via IV as a pre-infusion medication. The remaining 20 mg of dexamethasone was administered via IV on successive day of carfilzomib and/or DARZALEX infusions. For patients >75 years on a reduced dexamethasone dose of 20 mg, the entire 20 mg dose was given as a DARZALEX pre-infusion medication. Dose adjustments for carfilzomib and dexamethasone were applied according to manufacturer's prescribing information. Treatment was continued in both arms until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
A total of 466 patients were randomized; 312 to the DKd arm and 154 to the Kd arm. The baseline demographic and disease characteristics were similar between the DARZALEX and the control arm. The median patient age was 64 years (range 29 to 84 years), 9% were ≥75 years, 58% were male; 79% Caucasian, 14% Asian, and 2% African American. Patients had received a median of 2 prior lines of therapy and 58% of patients had received prior autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). The majority of patients (92%) received a prior PI and of those 34% were refractory to PI including regimen. Fourty-two percent (42%) of patients had received prior lenalidomide and of those, 33% were refractory to a lenalidomide containing regimen.
Efficacy was evaluated by PFS based on IMWG criteria. Study 20160275 demonstrated an improvement in PFS in the DKd arm as compared to the Kd arm; the median PFS had not been reached in the DKd arm and was 15.8 months in the Kd arm (hazard ratio [HR]=0.630; 95% CI: 0.464, 0.854; p=0.0014), representing 37% reduction in the risk of disease progression or death for patients treated with DKd versus Kd. PFS improvement observed in the ITT population was also observed in lenalidomide refractory patients. (See Figure 10.)

Click on icon to see table/diagram/image

After a median follow-up of 17.1 months, 95 deaths were observed [N=59 (19%) in the DKd group and N=36 (23%) in the Kd group]. Overall survival (OS) data were not mature, however, there was a trend toward longer OS in the DKd arm compared with the Kd arm (HR=0.745; 95% CI: 0.491, 1.131; p=0.0836).
Additional efficacy results from Study 20160275 are presented in table as follows. (See Table 6.)

Click on icon to see table/diagram/image

In responders, the median time to response was 1 month (range: 1 to 14 months) in the DKd group and 1 month (range: 1 to 10 months) in the Kd group. The median duration of response had not been reached in the DKd group and was 16.6 months (95% CI: 13.9, not estimable) in the Kd group.
Combination treatment with once-weekly (20/70 mg/m²) carfilzomib and dexamethasone: Study MMY1001 was an open-label trial in which 85 patients with multiple myeloma who had received at least one prior therapy, received 16 mg/kg DARZALEX in combination with carfilzomib and low-dose dexamethasone until disease progression. Carfilzomib was administered as IV infusion once weekly at a dose of 20 mg/m² on Cycle 1 Day 1 and escalated to dose of 70 mg/m² on Cycle 1 Days 8 and 15, and Days 1, 8, and 15 of subsequent cycles. Dexamethasone was given at 40 mg (subjects ≤75 years) or 20 mg (subjects >75 years) per week. For first DARZALEX split-dose, dexamethasone was administered on Day 1 and Day 2 before the DARZALEX infusions. During other DARZALEX infusion weeks, dexamethasone was administered on infusion days at a dose of 20 mg before the DARZALEX infusion and 20 mg the day after the DARZALEX infusion.
The median patient age was 66 years (range: 38 to 85 years) with 9% of patients ≥75 years of age. Patients in the study had received a median of 2 prior lines of therapy. Seventy three percent (73%) of patients had received prior ASCT. All patients received prior bortezomib, and 95% of patients received prior lenalidomide. Sixty percent (60%) of patients were refractory to lenalidomide and 29% of patients were refractory to both a PI an IMiD.
Efficacy results were based on overall response rate using IMWG criteria (see Table 7).

Click on icon to see table/diagram/image

The median duration of response was 28 months (95% CI: 20.5, not estimable). The median PFS was 26 months (95% CI: 4.8, NE), after a median follow-up of 24 months. Median overall survival was not reached. The 24-month survival rate was 71%.
Monotherapy: The clinical efficacy and safety of DARZALEX monotherapy for the treatment of patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma whose prior therapy included a proteasome inhibitor and an immunomodulatory agent, was demonstrated in two open-label studies.
In Study MMY2002, 106 patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma received 16 mg/kg DARZALEX until disease progression. The median patient age was 63.5 years (range, 31 to 84 years), 49% were male and 79% were Caucasian. Patients had received a median of 5 prior lines of therapy. Eighty percent of patients had received prior autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Prior therapies included bortezomib (99%), lenalidomide (99%), pomalidomide (63%) and carfilzomib (50%). At baseline, 97% of patients were refractory to the last line of treatment, 95% were refractory to both, a PI and IMiD, 77% were refractory to alkylating agents, 63% were refractory to pomalidomide and 48% of patients were refractory to carfilzomib.
Efficacy results based on Independent Review Committee (IRC) assessment are presented in the table as follows. (See Table 8.)

Click on icon to see table/diagram/image

Overall response rate (ORR) in MMY2002 was similar regardless of type of prior anti-myeloma therapy. With a median duration of follow-up of 9 months, median OS was not reached. The 12-month OS rate was 65% (95% CI: 51.2, 75.5).
In Study GEN501, 42 patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma received 16 mg/kg DARZALEX until disease progression. The median patient age was 64 years (range, 44 to 76 years), 64% were male and 76% were Caucasian. Patients in the study had received a median of 4 prior lines of therapy. Seventy-four percent of patients had received prior ASCT. Prior therapies included bortezomib (100%), lenalidomide (95%), pomalidomide (36%) and carfilzomib (19%). At baseline, 76% of patients were refractory to the last line of treatment, 64% were refractory to both a PI and IMiD, 60% were refractory to alkylating agents, 36% were refractory to pomalidomide and 17% were refractory to carfilzomib.
Treatment with daratumumab at 16 mg/kg led to a 36% ORR with 5% CR and 5% VGPR. The median time to response was 1 (range: 0.5 to 3.2) month. The median duration of response was not reached (95% CI: 5.6 months, not estimable). With a median duration of follow-up of 10 months, median OS was not reached. The 12-month OS rate was 77% (95% CI: 58.0, 88.2).
Pharmacokinetics: The pharmacokinetics (PK) of daratumumab following intravenous administration of DARZALEX monotherapy were evaluated in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma at dose levels from 0.1 mg/kg to 24 mg/kg. A population PK model of daratumumab was developed to describe the PK characteristics of daratumumab and to evaluate the influence of covariates on the disposition of daratumumab in patients with multiple myeloma. The population PK analysis included 223 patients receiving DARZALEX monotherapy in two clinical trials (150 subjects received 16 mg/kg).
In the 1- to 24 mg/kg cohorts, peak serum concentrations (C_max) after the first dose increased in approximate proportion to dose and volume of distribution was consistent with initial distribution into the plasma compartment. Increases in AUC were more than dose-proportional and clearance (CL) decreased with increasing dose. These observations suggest CD38 may become saturated at higher doses, after which the impact of target binding clearance is minimized and the clearance of daratumumab approximates the linear clearance of endogenous IgG1. Clearance also decreased with multiple doses, which may be related to tumor burden decreases.
Terminal half-life increases with increasing dose and with repeated dosing. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) estimated terminal half-life of daratumumab following the first 16 mg/kg dose was 9 (4.3) days. Based on population PK analysis, the mean (SD) half-life associated with non-specific linear elimination was approximately 18 (9) days; this is the terminal half-life that can be expected upon complete saturation of target mediated clearance and repeat dosing of daratumumab.
At the end of weekly dosing for the recommended monotherapy schedule and dose of 16 mg/kg, the mean (SD) serum C_max value was 915 (410.3) micrograms/mL, approximately 2.9-fold higher than following the first infusion. The mean (SD) predose (trough) serum concentration at the end of weekly dosing was 573 (331.5) micrograms/mL.
Based on the population PK analysis of DARZALEX monotherapy, daratumumab steady state is achieved approximately 5 months into the every 4-week dosing period (by the 21st infusion), and the mean (SD) ratio of C_max at steady-state to C_max after the first dose was 1.6 (0.5). The mean (SD) central volume of distribution is 56.98 (18.07) mL/kg.
Four additional population PK analyses were conducted in patients with multiple myeloma that received daratumumab in various combination therapies (N=1765). Daratumumab concentration-time profiles were similar following the monotherapy and combination therapies. The mean estimated terminal half-life associated with linear clearance in combination therapy was approximately 15-24 days.
Based on population PK analysis body weight was identified as a statistically significant covariate for daratumumab clearance. Therefore, body weight based dosing is an appropriate dosing strategy for the multiple myeloma patients.
Simulation of daratumumab pharmacokinetics was conducted for all recommended dosing schedules using individual PK parameters of patients with multiple myeloma (n=1309). The simulation results confirmed that the split and single dosing for the first dose should provide similar PK, with the exception of the PK profile in the first day of the treatment.
Special populations: Age and gender: Based on population PK analyses in patients receiving monotherapy or various combination therapies, age (range: 31-93 years) had no clinically important effect on the PK of daratumumab, and the exposure of daratumumab was similar between younger (aged <65 years, n=706) and older (aged ≥65 to <75 years n=913; aged ≥ 75 years, n=369) patients.
Gender did not affect exposure of daratumumab to a clinically relevant degree in population PK analyses.
Renal impairment: No formal studies of DARZALEX in patients with renal impairment have been conducted. Population PK analyses were performed based on pre-existing renal function data in patients receiving daratumumab monotherapy or various combination therapies, including 592 patients with normal renal function (creatinine clearance [CRCL] ≥90 mL/min), 757 with mild renal impairment (CRCL <90 and ≥60 mL/min), 604 with moderate renal impairment (CRCL <60 and ≥30 mL/min), and 34 with severe renal impairment or end stage renal disease (CRCL <30 mL/min). No clinically important differences in exposure to daratumumab were observed between patients with renal impairment and those with normal renal function.
Hepatic impairment: No formal studies of DARZALEX in patients with hepatic impairment have been conducted. Population PK analyses were performed in patients receiving daratumumab monotherapy or various combination therapies, including 1742 patients with normal hepatic function (total bilirubin [TB] and aspartate aminotransferase [AST] ≤ upper limit of normal [ULN]), 224 with mild hepatic impairment (TB 1.0× to 1.5× ULN or AST>ULN) and 10 patients with moderate (TB >1.5× to 3.0× ULN; n=9) or severe (TB >3.0× ULN; n=1) hepatic impairment. No clinically important differences in the exposure to daratumumab were observed between patients with hepatic impairment and those with normal hepatic function.
Race: Based on the population PK analyses in patients receiving either daratumumab monotherapy or various combination therapies, the exposure to daratumumab was similar between white (n=1662) and non-white (n=326) subjects.
Toxicology: NON-CLINICAL INFORMATION: Carcinogenicity and Mutagenicity: No animal studies have been performed to establish the carcinogenic potential of daratumumab. Routine genotoxicity and carcinogenicity studies are generally not applicable to biologic pharmaceuticals as large proteins cannot diffuse into cells and cannot interact with DNA or chromosomal material.
Reproductive Toxicology: No animal studies have been performed to evaluate the potential effects of daratumumab on reproduction or development.
Fertility: No animal studies have been performed to determine potential effects on fertility in males or females.

DARZALEX is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with multiple myeloma: in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone: in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who are ineligible for autologous stem cell transplant.
In patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma who have received at least one prior therapy.
In combination with bortezomib, melphalan, prednisone for the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who are ineligible for autologous stem cell transplant.
In combination with bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone in newly diagnosed patients who are eligible for autologous stem cell transplant.
In combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone, for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma who have received at least one prior therapy.
In combination with carfilzomib and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma who have received one to three prior lines of therapy.
As monotherapy, for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma who have received at least three prior lines of therapy including a proteasome inhibitor (PI) and an immunomodulatory agent or who are double-refractory to a PI and an immunomodulatory agent.

DARZALEX should be administered by a healthcare professional, with immediate access to emergency equipment and appropriate medical support to manage infusion-related reactions (IRRs) if they occur.
Pre- and post-infusion medications should be administered (see Recommended concomitant medications as follows).
Dosage - Adults (≥18 years): Recommended dose: The DARZALEX dosing schedule in Table 9 is for combination therapy with 4-week cycle regimens (e.g. lenalidomide) and for monotherapy as follows: combination therapy with lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma ineligible for autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT); combination therapy with lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma; combination therapy with carfilzomib and low-dose dexamethasone for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma; monotherapy for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
The recommended dose is DARZALEX 16 mg/kg body weight administered as an intravenous infusion according to the following dosing schedule (infusion rates presented in Table 14): (See Table 9.)

Click on icon to see table/diagram/image

The recommended dose for DARZALEX when administered in combination with carfilzomib and dexamethasone (4-week cycle) for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma is provided in Table 10: (See Table 10.)

Click on icon to see table/diagram/image

For dosing instructions of medicinal products administered with DARZALEX, see Pharmacology: Pharmacodynamics: Clinical studies under Actions and manufacturer's prescribing information.
The DARZALEX dosing schedule in Table 11 is for combination therapy with bortezomib, melphalan and prednisone (6-week cycle regimen) for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma ineligible for ASCT.
The recommended dose is DARZALEX 16 mg/kg body weight administered as an intravenous infusion according to the following dosing schedule (infusion rates presented in Table 14): (See Table 11.)

Click on icon to see table/diagram/image

Bortezomib is given twice weekly at Weeks 1, 2, 4 and 5 for the first 6-week cycle, followed by once weekly at Weeks 1, 2, 4 and 5 for eight more 6-week cycles. For information on the VMP dose and dosing schedule when administered with DARZALEX, see Pharmacology: Pharmacodynamics: Clinical studies under Actions.
The DARZALEX dosing schedule in Table 12 is for combination therapy with bortezomib, thalidomide and dexamethasone (4-week cycle regimens) for treatment of newly diagnosed patients eligible for ASCT.
The recommended dose is DARZALEX 16mg/kg body weight administered as an intravenous infusion according to the following dosing schedule (infusion rates presented in Table 14): (See Table 12.)

Click on icon to see table/diagram/image

For dosing instructions of medicinal products administered with DARZALEX, see Pharmacology: Pharmacodynamics: Clinical studies under Actions and manufacturer's prescribing information.
The DARZALEX dosing schedule in Table 13 is for combination therapy with bortezomib and dexamethasone (3-week cycle regimen) for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
The recommended dose is DARZALEX 16 mg/kg body weight administered as an intravenous infusion according to the following dosing schedule (infusion rates presented in Table 14): (See Table 13.)

Click on icon to see table/diagram/image

For dosing instructions for medicinal products administered with DARZALEX see Pharmacology: Pharmacodynamics: Clinical studies under Actions and manufacturer's prescribing information.
Missed dose(s): If a planned dose of DARZALEX is missed, administer the dose as soon as possible and adjust the dosing schedule accordingly, maintaining the treatment interval.
Dose modifications: No dose reductions of DARZALEX are recommended. Dose delay may be required to allow recovery of blood cell counts in the event of hematological toxicity (see Precautions). For information concerning medicinal products given in combination with DARZALEX, see manufacturer's prescribing information.
Recommended concomitant medications: Pre-infusion medication: Administer the following pre-infusion medications to reduce the risk of IRRs to all patients 1-3 hours prior to every infusion of DARZALEX: Corticosteroid (long-acting or intermediate-acting): Monotherapy: Methylprednisolone 100 mg, or equivalent, administered intravenously. Following the second infusion, the dose of corticosteroid may be reduced (oral or intravenous methylprednisolone 60 mg).
Combination therapy: Administer 20 mg dexamethasone (or equivalent) prior to every DARZALEX infusion. When dexamethasone is the background-regimen specific corticosteroid, the dexamethasone treatment dose will instead serve as pre-medication on DARZALEX infusion days (see Pharmacology: Pharmacodynamics: Clinical studies under Actions).
Dexamethasone is given intravenously prior to the first DARZALEX infusion and oral administration may be considered prior to subsequent infusions. Additional background-regimen specific corticosteroids (e.g. prednisone) should not be taken on DARZALEX infusion days when patients have received dexamethasone as a pre-medication.
Antipyretics (oral paracetamol/acetaminophen 650 to 1000 mg).
Antihistamine (oral or intravenous diphenhydramine 25 to 50 mg or equivalent).
Post-infusion medication: Administer post-infusion medication to reduce the risk of delayed infusion related reactions as follows: Monotherapy: Administer oral corticosteroid (20 mg methylprednisolone or equivalent dose of an intermediate acting or long acting corticosteroid in accordance with local standards) on each of the 2 days following all DARZALEX infusions (beginning the day after the infusion).
Combination therapy: Consider administering low-dose oral methylprednisolone (≤ 20 mg) or equivalent the day after the DARZALEX infusion.
However, if a background regimen-specific corticosteroid (e.g. dexamethasone, prednisone) is administered the day after the DARZALEX infusion, additional post-infusion medications may not be needed (see Pharmacology: Pharmacodynamics: Clinical studies under Actions).
Additionally, for patients with a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, consider the use of post-infusion medications including short and long acting bronchodilators, and inhaled corticosteroids. Following the first four infusions, if the patient experiences no major IRRs, these inhaled post-infusion medications may be discontinued at the discretion of the physician.
Prophylaxis for herpes zoster virus reactivation: Anti-viral prophylaxis should be considered for the prevention of herpes zoster virus reactivation.
Special populations: Pediatrics (17 years of age and younger): The safety and efficacy of DARZALEX have not been established in pediatric patients.
Elderly (65 years of age and older): No dose adjustments are considered necessary in elderly patients (see Pharmacology: Pharmacokinetics under Actions and Adverse Reactions).
Renal impairment: No formal studies of daratumumab in patients with renal impairment have been conducted. Based on population pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses, no dosage adjustment is necessary for patients with renal impairment (see Pharmacology: Pharmacokinetics under Actions).
Hepatic impairment: No formal studies of daratumumab in patients with hepatic impairment have been conducted. Changes in hepatic function are unlikely to have any effect on the elimination of daratumumab since IgG1 molecules such as daratumumab are not metabolized through hepatic pathways. Based on population PK analyses, no dosage adjustments are necessary for patients with hepatic impairment (see Pharmacology: Pharmacokinetics under Actions).
Administration: DARZALEX is administered as an intravenous infusion following dilution with 0.9% Sodium Chloride. For instructions on dilution of the medicinal product before administration, see Instructions for Use and Handling and Disposal under Cautions for Usage.
Following dilution the DARZALEX infusion should be intravenously administered at the appropriate initial infusion rate presented in Table 14 as follows. Incremental escalation of the infusion rate should be considered only in the absence of infusion reactions.
To facilitate administration, the first prescribed 16 mg/kg dose at Week 1 may be split over two consecutive days i.e. 8 mg/kg on Day 1 and Day 2 respectively, see Table 14 as follows.
For patients receiving DARZALEX in combination with carfilzomib and dexamethasone (DKd), 16 mg/kg daratumumab dose at Week 1 should be split over two days to minimize risk of volume overload (see option 2 under Table 14). (See Table 14.)

Click on icon to see table/diagram/image

Management of infusion-related reactions: Administer pre-infusion medications to reduce the risk of IRRs prior to treatment with DARZALEX.
For IRRs of any grade/severity, immediately interrupt the DARZALEX infusion and manage symptoms.
Management of IRRs may further require reduction in the rate of infusion, or treatment discontinuation of DARZALEX as outlined as follows (see also Precautions).
Grade 1-2 (mild to moderate): Once reaction symptoms resolve, resume the infusion at no more than half the rate at which the IRR occurred. If the patient does not experience any further IRR symptoms, infusion rate escalation may resume at increments and intervals as clinically appropriate up to the maximum rate of 200 mL/hour (Table 14).
Grade 3 (severe): Once reaction symptoms resolve, consider restarting the infusion at no more than half the rate at which the reaction occurred. If the patient does not experience additional symptoms, resume infusion rate escalation at increments and intervals as appropriate (Table 14). Repeat the procedure as previously mentioned in the event of recurrence of Grade 3 symptoms. Permanently discontinue DARZALEX upon the third occurrence of a Grade 3 or greater infusion reaction.
Grade 4 (life-threatening): Permanently discontinue DARZALEX treatment.

Symptoms and signs: There has been no experience of overdosage in clinical studies. Doses up to 24 mg/kg have been administered intravenously in a clinical study without reaching the maximum tolerated dose.
Treatment: There is no known specific antidote for DARZALEX overdose. In the event of an overdose, the patient should be monitored for any signs or symptoms of adverse effects and appropriate symptomatic treatment be instituted immediately.

Patients with a history of severe hypersensitivity to daratumumab or any of the excipients.

Infusion-related reactions: DARZALEX can cause serious IRRs, including anaphylactic reactions. These reactions can be life-threatening and fatal outcomes have been reported.
Monitor patients throughout the infusion and the post-infusion period.
In clinical trials, IRRs were reported in approximately half of all patients treated with DARZALEX.
The majority of IRRs occurred at the first infusion and were Grade 1-2. Four percent of patients had an IRR at more than one infusion. Severe reactions have occurred, including bronchospasm, hypoxia, dyspnea, and hypertension, laryngeal edema, pulmonary edema, myocardial infarction, and ocular adverse reactions (including choroidal effusion, acute myopia and acute angle closure glaucoma). Signs and symptoms may include respiratory symptoms, such as nasal congestion, cough, throat irritation, as well as chills, vomiting and nausea. Less common symptoms were wheezing, allergic rhinitis, pyrexia, chest discomfort, pruritus, hypotension, and blurred vision (see Adverse Reactions).
Pre-medicate patients with antihistamines, antipyretics and corticosteroids to reduce the risk of IRRs prior to treatment with DARZALEX. Interrupt DARZALEX infusion for IRRs of any severity and institute medical management/supportive treatment as needed. For patients with Grade 1, 2, or 3 reactions, reduce the infusion rate when re-starting the infusion. If an anaphylactic reaction or life threatening (Grade 4) IRR occurs, permanently discontinue administration of DARZALEX and institute appropriate emergency care (see Dosage & Administration).
To reduce the risk of delayed IRRs, administer oral corticosteroids to all patients following all DARZALEX infusions. Additionally consider the use of post-infusion medications (e.g. inhaled corticosteroids, short and long acting bronchodilators) for patients with a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease to manage respiratory complications should they occur. If ocular symptoms occur, interrupt DARZALEX infusion and seek immediate ophthalmologic evaluation prior to restarting DARZALEX (see Dosage & Administration).
Neutropenia/Thrombocytopenia: DARZALEX may increase neutropenia and thrombocytopenia induced by background therapy (see Adverse Reactions).
Monitor complete blood cell counts periodically during treatment according to manufacturer's prescribing information for background therapies. Monitor patients with neutropenia for signs of infection. DARZALEX dose delay may be required to allow recovery of blood cell counts. No dose reduction of DARZALEX is recommended. Consider supportive care with transfusions or growth factors.
Interference with indirect antiglobulin test (indirect Coombs test): Daratumumab binds to CD38 found at low levels on red blood cells (RBCs) and may result in a positive indirect Coombs test. Daratumumab-mediated positive indirect Coombs test may persist for up to 6 months after the last daratumumab infusion. It should be recognized that daratumumab bound to RBCs may mask detection of antibodies to minor antigens in the patient's serum. The determination of a patient's ABO and Rh blood type are not impacted.
Type and screen patients prior to starting DARZALEX.
In the event of a planned transfusion notify blood transfusion centers of this interference with indirect antiglobulin tests (see Interactions). If an emergency transfusion is required, non-cross-matched ABO/RhD-compatible RBCs can be given per local blood bank practices.
Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) reactivation: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation, in some cases fatal, has been reported in patients treated with DARZALEX. HBV screening should be performed in all patients before initiation of treatment with DARZALEX.
For patients with evidence of positive HBV serology, monitor for clinical and laboratory signs of HBV reactivation during, and for at least six months following the end of DARZALEX treatment. Manage patients according to current clinical guidelines. Consider consulting a hepatitis disease expert as clinically indicated.
In patients who develop reactivation of HBV while on DARZALEX, suspend treatment with DARZALEX and any concomitant steroids, chemotherapy, and institute appropriate treatment. Resumption of DARZALEX treatment in patients whose HBV reactivation is adequately controlled should be discussed with physicians with expertise in managing HBV.
Effects on Ability to Drive and Use Machines: DARZALEX has no or negligible influence on the ability to drive and use machines. However, fatigue has been reported in patients taking daratumumab and this should be taken into account when driving or using machines.

Pregnancy: There are no human or animal data to assess the risk of DARZALEX use during pregnancy. IgG1 monoclonal antibodies are known to cross the placenta after the first trimester of pregnancy. Therefore DARZALEX should not be used during pregnancy unless the benefit of treatment to the woman is considered to outweigh the potential risks to the fetus. If the patient becomes pregnant while taking this drug, the patient should be informed of the potential risk to the fetus.
To avoid exposure to the fetus, women of reproductive potential should use effective contraception during and for 3 months after cessation of DARZALEX treatment.
Breast-feeding: It is not known whether daratumumab is excreted into human or animal milk or affects milk production. There are no studies to assess the effect of daratumumab on the breast-fed infant.
Maternal IgG is excreted in human milk, but does not enter the neonatal and infant circulations in substantial amounts as they are degraded in the gastrointestinal tract and not absorbed. Because the risks of DARZALEX to the infant from oral ingestion are unknown, a decision should be made whether to discontinue breast-feeding, or discontinue DARZALEX therapy, taking into account the benefit of breast feeding for the child and the benefit of therapy for the woman.
Fertility: No data are available to determine potential effects of daratumumab on fertility in males or females.

Throughout this section, adverse reactions are presented. Adverse reactions are adverse events that were considered to be reasonably associated with the use of daratumumab based on the comprehensive assessment of the available adverse event information. A causal relationship with daratumumab cannot be reliably established in individual cases. Further, because clinical trials are conducted under widely varying conditions, adverse reaction rates observed in the clinical trials of a drug cannot be directly compared to rates in the clinical trials of another drug and may not reflect the rates observed in clinical practice.
The safety data described as follows reflect exposure to DARZALEX (16 mg/kg) in 2066 patients with multiple myeloma including 1910 patients who received DARZALEX in combination with background regimens and 156 patients who received DARZALEX as monotherapy.
Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: Combination treatment with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (DRd): Adverse reactions described in the table as follows reflect exposure to DARZALEX for a median treatment duration of 25.3 months (range: 0.1 to 40.44 months) for the daratumumab-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (DRd) group and median treatment duration of 21.3 months (range: 0.03 to 40.64 months) for the lenalidomide-dexamethasone group (Rd) in a Phase 3 active-controlled study (Study MMY3008). The most frequent (≥20%) adverse reactions were infusion reactions, diarrhea, constipation, nausea, peripheral edema, fatigue, back pain, asthenia, pyrexia, upper respiratory tract infection. bronchitis, pneumonia, decreased appetite, muscle spasms, peripheral sensory neuropathy, dyspnea and cough. Serious adverse reactions with a 2% greater incidence in the DRd arm compared to the Rd arm were dehydration (DRd 2% vs Rd <1%), bronchitis (DRd 4% vs Rd 2%) and pneumonia (DRd 15% vs Rd 8%). (See Table 15.)

Click on icon to see table/diagram/image

Laboratory abnormalities worsening during treatment from baseline listed in the table as follows. (See Table 16.)

Click on icon to see table/diagram/image

Combination treatment with bortezomib, melphalan and prednisone: Adverse reactions described in the table as follows reflect exposure to DARZALEX for a median treatment duration of 14.7 months (range: 0 to 25.8 months) for the daratumumab, bortezomib, melphalan and prednisone (D-VMP) group, and median treatment duration of 12 months (range: 0.1 to 14.9 months) for the VMP group in a Phase 3 active-controlled study (Study MMY3007). The most frequent adverse reactions (≥20%) were infusion reactions, upper respiratory tract infection and edema peripheral. Serious adverse reactions with at least a 2% greater incidence in the D-VMP arm compared to the VMP arm were pneumonia (D-VMP 11% vs VMP 4%), upper respiratory tract infection (D-VMP 5% vs VMP 1%), and pulmonary edema (D-VMP 2% vs VMP 0%). (See Table 17.)

Click on icon to see table/diagram/image

Laboratory abnormalities worsening during treatment from baseline listed in the table as follows. (See Table 18.)

Click on icon to see table/diagram/image

Combination treatment with bortezomib, thalidomide and dexamethasone (DVTd): Adverse reactions described in the table as follows reflect exposure to DARZALEX up to day 100 post-transplant in a Phase 3 active-controlled study, Study MMY3006 (see Pharmacology: Pharmacodynamics: Clinical studies under Actions). The median duration of induction/ASCT/consolidation treatment was 8.9 (range: 7.0 to 12.0) months for the DVTd group and 8.7 (range: 6.4 to 11.5) months for the VTd group. The most frequent adverse reactions (>20%) were infusion reactions, nausea, pyrexia, upper respiratory tract infection and bronchitis. Serious adverse reactions with a 2% greater incidence in the DVTd arm compared to the VTd arm were bronchitis (DVTd 2% vs VTd <1%) and pneumonia (DVTd 6% vs VTd 4%). (See Table 19.)

Click on icon to see table/diagram/image

Laboratory abnormalities worsening during treatment from baseline listed in the table as follows. (See Table 20.)

Click on icon to see table/diagram/image

Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Combination treatment with lenalidomide and dexamethasone: Adverse reactions described in the table as follows reflect exposure to DARZALEX for a median treatment duration of 13.1 months (range: 0 to 20.7 months) for the daratumumab-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (DRd) group and median treatment duration of 12.3 months (range: 0.2 to 20.1 months) for the lenalidomide-dexamethasone group (Rd) in a Phase 3 active-controlled study (Study MMY3003). The most frequent adverse reactions were infusion reactions, diarrhea, nausea, fatigue, pyrexia, upper respiratory tract infection, muscle spasms, cough and dyspnea. Serious adverse reactions were pneumonia, upper respiratory tract infection, influenza and pyrexia. Adverse reactions resulted in discontinuations for 7% (n=19) of patients in the DRd arm versus 8% (n=22) in the Rd arm. (See Table 21.)

Click on icon to see table/diagram/image

Laboratory abnormalities worsening during treatment from baseline are listed in the table as follows. (See Table 22.)

Click on icon to see table/diagram/image

Combination treatment with bortezomib and dexamethasone: Adverse reactions described in table as follows reflect exposure to DARZALEX for a median treatment duration of 6.5 months (range: 0 to 14.8 months) for the daratumumab-bortezomib-dexamethasone (DVd) group and median treatment duration of 5.2 months (range: 0.2 to 8.0 months) for the bortezomib-dexamethasone group (Vd) in a Phase 3 active-controlled study (Study MMY3004). The most frequent adverse reactions (>20%) were infusion reactions, diarrhea, peripheral edema, upper respiratory tract infection, peripheral sensory neuropathy, cough and dyspnea. Serious adverse reactions included diarrhea, upper respiratory tract infection and atrial fibrillation. Adverse reactions resulted in discontinuations for 7% (n=18) of patients in the DVd arm versus 9% (n=22) in the Vd arm. (See Table 23.)

Click on icon to see table/diagram/image

Laboratory abnormalities worsening during treatment are listed in the table as follows. (See Table 24.)

Click on icon to see table/diagram/image

Combination treatment with twice-weekly (20/56 mg/m²) carfilzomib and dexamethasone: Adverse reactions described in the table as follows reflect exposure to DARZALEX for a median treatment duration of 16.1 months (range: 0.1 to 23.7 months) for the daratumumab-carfilzomib-dexamethasone (DKd) group and median treatment duration of 9.3 months (range: 0.1 to 22.4 months) for the carfilzomib-dexamethasone group (Kd) in a Phase 3 active-controlled study (Study 20160275). The most frequent (> 20%) adverse reactions were infusion reactions, diarrhea, fatigue, upper respiratory tract infection, and pneumonia. Serious adverse reactions with a 2% greater incidence in the DKd arm compared to the Kd arm were pneumonia (DKd 14% vs Kd 11%), sepsis (DKd 6% vs Kd 3%), influenza (DKd 4% vs Kd 1%), pyrexia (DKd 4% vs Kd 2%), bronchitis (DKd 2% vs Kd 0%), and diarrhea (DKd 2% vs Kd 0%). Fatal events within 30 days of treatment cessation, regardless of causality, were reported in 10% of all patients treated with DKd versus 5% of patients treated with Kd and the most common cause was infection. Within the DKd group, fatal events occurred in 15% of the patients > 65 years and 6% of the patients < 65 years (see Infections and Other special population as follows).
Pre-specified infusion reaction related terms that occurred on the same date or next date of any daratumumab dosing was 18% in the DKd arm and on the same date or next date of first daratumumab dosing was 12& in the DKd arm. Infusion reaction related terms that occurred on the same date of any carfilzomib dosing was 41% in the DKd arm compared to 28% in the KD arm and on the same date of first carfilzomib dosing was 13% in the DKd arm compared to 1% in the Kd arm. (See Table 25.)

Click on icon to see table/diagram/image

Laboratory abnormalities worsening during treatment from baseline are listed in the table as follows. (See Table 26.)

Click on icon to see table/diagram/image

Combination treatment with once-weekly carfilzomib (20/70 mg/m²) and dexamethasone: Adverse reactions described in table as follows reflect exposure to DARZALEX, carfilzomib and dexamethasone (DKd) for a median treatment duration of 19.8 months (range 0.3 to 34.5 months) in Study MMY1001. Fatal events within 30 days of treatment cessation, regardless of causality, were reported in 4% of all patients treated with DKd. (See Table 27.)

Click on icon to see table/diagram/image

Laboratory abnormalities worsening during treatment from baseline listed in the table as follows. (See Table 28.)

Click on icon to see table/diagram/image

Monotherapy: The data described as follows reflect exposure to DARZALEX in three pooled open label clinical studies that included 156 patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma treated with DARZALEX at 16 mg/kg. The median duration of DARZALEX treatment was 3.3 months, with the longest duration of treatment being 14.2 months.
Adverse reactions occurring at a rate of ≥ 10% are presented in the table as follows. The most frequently reported adverse reactions (≥ 20%) were IRRs, fatigue, nausea, back pain, anemia, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Four percent of patients discontinued DARZALEX treatment due to adverse reactions, none of which were considered drug related.
Frequencies are defined as very common (≥ 1/10), common (≥ 1/100 to < 1/10), uncommon (≥ 1/1000 to < 1/100), rare (≥ 1/10000 to < 1/1000) and very rare (< 1/10000). (See Table 29.)

Click on icon to see table/diagram/image

Infusion related reactions: In clinical trials (monotherapy and combination treatments; N=2066) the incidence of any grade infusion-related reactions was 37% with the first (16 mg/kg, Week 1) infusion of DARZALEX, 2% with the Week 2 infusion, and cumulatively 6% with subsequent infusions. Less than 1% of patients had a Grade 3/4 infusion reaction at Week 2 or subsequent infusions.
The median time to onset of a reaction was 1.5 hours (range: 0 to 72.8 hours). The incidence of infusion modifications due to reactions was 36%. Median durations of 16 mg/kg infusions for the 1st, 2nd and subsequent infusions were approximately 7, 4 and 3 hours respectively.
Severe infusion-related reactions included bronchospasm, dyspnea, laryngeal edema, pulmonary edema, hypoxia, and hypertension. Other adverse infusion-related reactions included nasal congestion, cough, chills, throat irritation, vomiting and nausea (see Precautions).
When DARZALEX dosing was interrupted in the setting of ASCT (Study MMY3006) for a median of 3.75 (range: 2.4; 6.9) months, upon re-initiation of DARZALEX the incidence of IRRs was 11% at first infusion following ASCT. Infusion rate/dilution volume used upon re-initiation was that used for the last DARZALEX infusion prior to interruption due to ASCT. IRRs occurring at re-initiation of DARZALEX following ASCT were consistent in terms of symptoms and severity (Grade 3/4:<1%) with those reported in previous studies at Week 2 or subsequent infusions.
In study MMY1001, patients receiving daratumumab combination treatment (n=97) were administered the first 16 mg/kg daratumumab dose at Week 1 split over two days i.e. 8 mg/kg on Day 1 and Day 2 respectively. The incidence of any grade infusion-related reactions was 42%, with 36% of patients experiencing infusion-related reactions on Day 1 of Week 1, 4% on Day 2 of Week 1, and 8% with subsequent infusions. The median time to onset of a reaction was 1.8 hours (range: 0.1 to 5.4 hours). The incidence of infusion interruptions due to reactions was 30%. Median durations of infusions were 4.2 h for Week 1-Day 1, 4.2 h for Week 1-Day 2, and 3.4 hours for the subsequent infusions.
Infections: In patients receiving DARZALEX combination therapy, Grade 3 or 4 infections were reported as follows: Relapsed/refractory patient studies: DVd: 21%, Vd: 19%; DRd: 28%, Rd: 23%; DPd: 28%; DKd^a: 36%, Kd^a: 27%, DKd^b: 21%
^a where carfilzomib 20/56 mg/m2 was administered twice-weekly.
^b where carfilzomib 20/70 mg/m2 was administered once-weekly.
Newly diagnosed patient studies: D-VMP: 23%, VMP: 15%; DRd: 32%, Rd: 23%; DVTd: 22%, VTd: 20%.
Pneumonia was the most commonly reported severe (Grade 3 or 4) infection across studies. In active controlled studies, discontinuations from treatment due to infections occurred in 1-4% of patients. Fatal infections were primarily due to pneumonia and sepsis.
In patients receiving DARZALEX combination therapy, fatal infections (Grade 5) were reported as follows: Relapsed/refractory patient studies: DVd: 1%, Vd: 2%; DRd: 2%, Rd: 1%; DPd: 2%; DKd^a: 5%, Kd^a: 3%; DKd^b: 0%.
^a where carfilzomib 20/56 mg/m2 was administered twice-weekly.
^b where carfilzomib 20/70 mg/m2 was administered once-weekly.
Newly diagnosed patient studies: D-VMP: 1%, VMP: 1%; DRd: 2%, Rd: 2%; DVTd: 0%, VTd: 0%.
Other Adverse Reactions: Other adverse reactions reported in patients treated with daratumumab in clinical trials are listed in Table 30. (See Table 30.)

Click on icon to see table/diagram/image

Other special population: Of the 2459 patients who received DARZALEX at the recommended dose, 38% were 65 to 75 years of age, and 15% were 75 years of age or older. No overall differences in effectiveness were observed based on age. The incidence of serious adverse reactions was higher in older than in younger patients (see Adverse Reactions and Pharmacology: Pharmacodynamics: Clinical studies under Actions). Among patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (n=1213), the most common serious adverse reactions that occurred more frequently in elderly (≥65 years of age) were pneumonia and sepsis. Among patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who are ineligible for autologous stem cell transplant (n=710), the most common serious adverse reaction that occurred more frequently in elderly (≥75 years of age) was pneumonia.
Postmarketing data: Adverse reactions identified during postmarketing experience with daratumumab are included in Table 31. The frequencies are provided according to the following convention: Very common ≥1/10; Common ≥1/100 to <1/10; Uncommon ≥1/1000 to <1/100; Rare ≥1/10000 to <1/1000; Very rare <1/10000, including isolated reports; Not known frequency cannot be estimated from the available data.
In Table 26, adverse reactions are presented by frequency category based on spontaneous reporting rates, when known. (See Table 31.)

Click on icon to see table/diagram/image

No drug-drug interaction studies have been performed.
Clinical pharmacokinetic assessments of daratumumab in combination with lenalidomide, pomalidomide, thalidomide, bortezomib, carfilzomib and dexamethasone indicated no clinically-relevant drug-drug interaction between daratumumab and these small molecule medicinal products.
Effects of DARZALEX on laboratory tests: Interference with indirect antiglobulin test (indirect Coombs test): Daratumumab binds to CD38 on RBCs and interferes with compatibility testing, including antibody screening and cross matching. Daratumumab interference mitigation methods include treating reagent RBCs with dithiothreitol (DTT) to disrupt daratumumab binding or genotyping. Since the Kell blood group system is also sensitive to DTT treatment, Kell-negative units should be supplied after ruling out or identifying alloantibodies using DTT-treated RBCs.
Interference with serum protein electrophoresis and immunofixation tests: Daratumumab may be detected on serum protein electrophoresis (SPE) and immunofixation (IFE) assays used for monitoring disease monoclonal immunoglobulins (M protein). This can lead to false positive SPE and IFE assay results for patients with IgG kappa myeloma protein impacting initial assessment of Complete Responses (CRs) by International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria. In patients with persistent very good partial response (VGPR), where daratumumab interference is suspected, consider using a validated daratumumab-specific IFE assay to distinguish daratumumab from any remaining endogenous M protein in the patient's serum, to facilitate determination of a CR (see Pharmacology: Pharmacodynamics: Clinical studies under Actions).

Incompatibilities: This medicinal product must not be mixed with other medicinal products except those mentioned in Instructions for Use and Handling and Disposal as follows.
Instructions for Use and Handling and Disposal: Prepare the solution for infusion using aseptic technique as follows: Calculate the dose (mg), total volume (mL) of DARZALEX solution required and the number of DARZALEX vials needed based on patient weight.
Check that the DARZALEX solution is colorless to yellow. Do not use if opaque particles, discoloration or other foreign particles are present.
Using aseptic technique, remove a volume of 0.9% Sodium Chloride from the infusion bag/container that is equal to the required volume of DARZALEX solution.
Withdraw the necessary amount of DARZALEX solution and dilute to the appropriate volume by adding to an infusion bag/container containing 0.9% Sodium Chloride (see Dosage & Administration). Infusion bags/containers must be made of polyvinylchloride (PVC), polypropylene (PP), polyethylene (PE) or polyolefin blend (PP+PE). Dilute under appropriate aseptic conditions. Discard any unused portion left in the vial.
Gently invert the bag/container to mix the solution. Do not shake or freeze.
Parenteral drug products should be inspected visually for particulate matter and discoloration prior to administration, whenever solution and container permit. The diluted solution may develop very small, translucent to white proteinaceous particles, as daratumumab is a protein. Do not use if visibly opaque particles, discoloration or foreign particles are observed.
Since DARZALEX does not contain a preservative, diluted solutions should be administered within 15 hours (including infusion time) at room temperature 15°C-25°C (59°F-77°F) and in room light.
If not used immediately, the diluted solution can be stored prior to administration for up to 24 hours at refrigerated conditions 2°C - 8°C (36°F-46°F) and protected from light. Do not freeze. If stored in the refrigerator, allow the solution to come to room temperature before administration.
Administer the diluted solution by intravenous infusion using an infusion set fitted with a flow regulator and with an in-line, sterile, non-pyrogenic, low protein-binding polyethersulfone (PES) filter (pore size 0.22 or 0.2 micrometer). Polyurethane (PU), polybutadiene (PBD), PVC, PP or PE administration sets must be used.
Do not infuse DARZALEX concomitantly in the same intravenous line with other agents.
Do not store any unused portion of the infusion solution for reuse. Any unused product or waste material should be disposed of in accordance with local requirements.

Shelf Life: Unopened vials: 24 months.
After dilution: Since daratumumab solutions do not contain a preservative, unless the method of opening/dilution precludes the risk of microbial contamination, the product should be used immediately. If not used immediately, the solution may be stored in a refrigerator protected from light at 2°C-8°C (36°F-46°F) for up to 24 hours prior to use, followed by 15 hours (including infusion time) at room temperature 15°C-25°C (59°F-77°F) and room light. If stored in the refrigerator, allow the solution to come to room temperature before administration.
For storage conditions of the diluted medicinal product, see Shelf-Life as previously mentioned.

Targeted Cancer Therapy

L01FC01 - daratumumab ; Belongs to the class of CD38 (Clusters of Differentiation 38) inhibitors. Used in the treatment of cancer.

B