Pharmacotherapeutic group: Other antidepressants.
ATC Code: N06AX22.
Pharmacology: Pharmacodynamics: Mechanism of action: Agomelatine is a melatonin receptor (MT
1 and MT
2) agonist and 5-HT
2C receptor antagonist. Agomelatine has shown antidepressant-like and anxiolytic-like effect in animal models of depression (learned helplessness test, despair test, chronic mild stress), in models with circadian rhythm desynchronisation and in models related to stress and anxiety.
In vitro studies indicate that agomelatine has no effect on monoamine uptake and no affinity for α or β adrenergic, histaminergic, cholinergic, dopaminergic, or benzodiazepine receptors. Agomelatine has no influence on the extracellular levels of serotonin and increases dopamine and noradrenaline release specifically in the prefrontal cortex. These properties may explain why, compared with other antidepressants, it has less gastrointestinal (e.g. vomiting, constipation) and sexual function (e.g. libido decrease) side effects, and no cardiovascular side effects in clinical trials.
In humans, agomelatine has positive phase shifting properties; it induces a phase advance of sleep, body temperature decline and melatonin onset.
Agomelatine resynchronises circadian rhythms in animal models of circadian rhythm disruption.
In patients with MDD, treatment with agomelatine 25 mg increased slow wave sleep without modification of REM (Rapid Eye Movement) sleep amount or REM latency. Agomelatine 25 mg also induced an advance of the time of sleep onset and of minimum heart rate. From the first week of treatment, onset of sleep and the quality of sleep were significantly improved without daytime clumsiness as assessed by patients.
In patients with GAD, getting off to sleep and quality of sleep were significantly improved with agomelatine compared to placebo from Week 2 as assessed by patients.
At therapeutic doses, in healthy volunteers, agomelatine preserves daytime alertness and memory, with no sedation in the morning following drug intake.
Cardiovascular: In clinical trials, agomelatine had no effect on QT interval and no clinically significant effect on heart rate, blood pressure and ECG tracings.
Withdrawal/Discontinuation: The abrupt discontinuation of agomelatine was evaluated in a specific active control trial (CL3-030) using the Discontinuation Emergent Signs and Symptoms (DESS) checklist. Patients with MDD were treated under double-blind conditions with agomelatine 25 mg or paroxetine 20 mg over a 12-week period. Only those who remitted at week eight and sustained that remission until week 12 were randomised to placebo or the initial active treatment for a two-week double-blind period. Patients discontinued from agomelatine to placebo were compared to those who continued treatment on agomelatine and, likewise for the active control paroxetine. The abrupt discontinuation of agomelatine was not associated with discontinuation symptoms [p=0.250 for difference between the agomelatine and placebo groups]. The sensitivity of the trial was demonstrated by the presence of significant emergent discontinuation symptoms following the abrupt discontinuation of treatment with the active control paroxetine [p<0.001 for difference between the paroxetine and placebo groups].
In a long-term GAD treatment trial [CL3-050] abrupt cessation of agomelatine was not associated with discontinuation symptoms.
Sexual function: No deleterious effect on sexual function (SEX-FX total score and SEX-FX sub-scores and items) was observed during agomelatine 50 mg treatment over 12 or 24-week treatment periods in a specific sexual dysfunction comparative trial in remitted depressed patients. There was a numerical trend towards less sexual emergent dysfunction on agomelatine 50 mg than venlafaxine 150 mg for SEX-FX drive arousal or orgasm scores but statistical separation was not achieved.
A separate pooled analysis of trials using the Arizona Sexual Experience Scale (ASEX) showed that agomelatine was not associated with sexual dysfunction. In healthy volunteers agomelatine did not affect sexual function, in contrast to paroxetine.
Clinical trials: Acute treatment of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD): The efficacy and safety of agomelatine in the treatment of major depression have been studied in a clinical development programme including 8,084 patients treated with therapeutic doses of 25 mg or 50 mg. Among over 7,130 patients treated with agomelatine for between six weeks and one year, 2,356 patients were treated with agomelatine for six months and 1,094 patients were treated with agomelatine for one year.
Ten placebo-controlled trials have been performed to investigate the short-term efficacy of agomelatine in MDD in adults, with fixed dose and/or dose up-titration. At the end of treatment (over six or eight weeks), five one step up-titration trials and one of the fixed dose trials showed statistically the superiority of agomelatine over placebo on the primary outcome criterion HAM-D total score and consistent results across secondary criteria (trials CL2-014, CL3-042, CL3-043, CL3-069, CAGO178A2301 for 50 mg dose (but not 25 mg dose), CAGO178A2302 for 25 mg dose (but not 50 mg dose)). Response rates were statistically significantly higher with agomelatine compared with placebo. The response to treatment of MDD was defined as a decrease in HAM-D total score of at least 50% from baseline.). The superiority of agomelatine over placebo was shown after two weeks of treatment.
Agomelatine did not differentiate from placebo in two trials (CL3-022, CAGO178A2303) where the active control fluoxetine or paroxetine showed assay sensitivity. In these trials agomelatine was not compared directly with paroxetine or fluoxetine as these comparators were included only to validate the assay sensitivity of the trials. In two other trials (CL3-023, 024), it was not possible to draw any conclusions because the active controls, paroxetine and fluoxetine, failed to differentiate from placebo. (See Table 1.)
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
The short-term efficacy of 25-50 mg/day of agomelatine was also demonstrated in trial CL3-046 which assessed the antidepressant efficacy of agomelatine as a secondary objective compared to sertraline (50-100 mg/day) over a double-blind treatment period of six weeks where male or female patients, aged 18-60 years fulfilling DSM-IV criteria for MDD, received agomelatine 25-50 mg/day or sertraline 50-100 mg/day (see Table 2).
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
The short-term efficacy of agomelatine was also shown in trial CL3-045 which demonstrated the antidepressant efficacy of agomelatine vs fluoxetine after a double-blind treatment period of eight weeks where male or female patients, aged 18-65 years fulfilling DSM-IV criteria for MDD, received agomelatine 25-50 mg/day or fluoxetine 20-40 mg/day (see Table 3).
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
Superiority (CL3-045 and CL3-046) or non-inferiority (CL3-052, CL3-035, CL3-056 and CL3-063) with agomelatine has been shown in six short-term efficacy trials in heterogeneous populations of adult patients with depression compared to SSRI/SNRI (sertraline, escitalopram, fluoxetine or venlafaxine). The antidepressant effect was assessed with the HAMD-17 score either as the primary (two studies) or secondary endpoint (four studies).
Acute treatment of MDD in the elderly: A double-blind, placebo-controlled eight week trial of agomelatine 25-50 mg/day in male and female patients with MDD aged ≥ 65 years (N=222, of which 151 were treated with agomelatine) demonstrated a statistically significant difference of 2.67 points on HAM-D total score, the primary outcome. Responder rate analysis favoured agomelatine. No improvement was observed in very elderly patients (≥ 75 years, N=69, of which 48 were treated with agomelatine), and agomelatine should not be used in that group.
Prevention of Relapse of Depression: The primary objective of trial CL3-041 was to assess the efficacy of agomelatine at flexible dose in the prevention of depressive relapse compared to placebo. In this trial, 492 patients received open label treatment with agomelatine 25 mg/day for eight to ten weeks, with an increase to 50 mg/day in patients who were not sufficiently improved after two weeks. Thereafter, the patients who responded to therapy (HAM-D total score ≤ 10) were randomised to receive treatment with agomelatine or placebo until relapse occurred for up to 44 weeks. 338 patients participated in the double blind, long-term portion of the trial: 165 were treated with agomelatine and 174 were treated with placebo. The primary efficacy criterion was the relapse, defined as HAM-D 17-item total score ≥ 16, or any withdrawal for lack of efficacy during the 44-week double-blind period.
The risk over time of relapse was significantly reduced by 54.2% in the agomelatine group compared to the placebo group in trial CL3-041 (see Figure 1). As is indicated in Table 4, the percentage of patients with a relapse during the 24-week double-blind period was more than two times lower in the agomelatine group than in the placebo group. (See Table 4.)
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
Results over the 44-week double-blind treatment period confirm the efficacy of agomelatine 25-50 mg to prevent depressive relapse in patients with MDD and showed the maintenance of long-term efficacy. The percentage of patients with a relapse over the whole 44-week double-blind period remained more than two times lower in the agomelatine group than in the placebo group (see Table 5).
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
As shown in Figure 2, the risk over time of relapse was significantly reduced by more than half, 56.3% in the agomelatine group compared to the placebo group. (See Figure 2.)
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
In another relapse-prevention trial (CL3-021), agomelatine did not separate from placebo as a result of an unexplained low relapse rate in the placebo group (23.5%) compared to the agomelatine group (25.9%) which was unexpected and markedly lower than the mean placebo relapse rate reported in the literature.
Acute Treatment of Generalised Anxiety Disorder (GAD): The efficacy and safety of agomelatine (25 mg & 50 mg/day) in generalised anxiety disorder have been studied in a clinical programme including more than 1,100 patients with GAD treated with agomelatine. On the primary endpoint of (HAM-A) total score in all three placebo-controlled short-term trials (12-week treatment) agomelatine demonstrated a statistically significant superiority compared to placebo. In addition, response and remission rates were superior with agomelatine vs placebo (see Table 6). Assay sensitivity was shown in the trial including escitalopram as a validator.
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
The results for meta-analyses performed on the change from baseline to W12 in HAM-A total score (primary criterion) and response to treatment at W12 in the pool of studies summarising the efficacy of agomelatine versus placebo are detailed in Table 7. (See Table 7.)
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
Efficacy was also observed in more severely anxious patients in the three placebo-controlled trials. The meta-analyses of HAM-A total score in GAD patients in the three short-term placebo-controlled studies (CL2-040, CL3-071, CL3-087) showed a significant treatment effect of agomelatine 25 and 25-50 mg in severely ill patients (defined successively by a HAM-A total score ≥ 25 at baseline or, a HAM-A total score ≥ 25 and CGI-S ≥ 5 at baseline) (see Table 8).
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
Prevention of Relapse of GAD: The maintenance of efficacy in generalised anxiety disorder was demonstrated in a relapse prevention trial [CL3-050]. The primary efficacy criterion was relapse during the double-blind treatment period defined as a HAM-A total score ≥ 15, or a lack of efficacy as judged by the clinician among patients who responded to the open-label treatment. Patients responding to 16-weeks of acute treatment with open-label agomelatine 25 mg once daily, with a possible up titration to 50 mg once daily after four weeks, were randomised to either agomelatine 25-50 mg or placebo for further six months (26 weeks). Agomelatine 25-50 mg once daily demonstrated a statistically significant superiority compared to placebo (p=0.046) on the primary outcome measure, the prevention of anxious relapse, as measured by time to relapse. The incidence of relapse during the 6-month double-blind follow up period was 19.5% and 30.7% [95% CI: 0.641;0.995) for agomelatine and placebo, respectively. In patients treated with agomelatine, the risk of relapse over time was significantly reduced by 41.8% compared to placebo (p=0.045) (see Table 9 and Figure 3).
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
Discontinuation symptoms in study CL3-050 were assessed by the Discontinuation Emergent Signs and Symptoms (DESS) checklist in patients having completed the study up to week 42 and re-randomised either on placebo or agomelatine. Absence of discontinuation syndrome after abrupt agomelatine treatment cessation was confirmed in this population.
Switching to agomelatine from other antidepressants (SSRIs or SNRIs): A specific controlled, three-week trial (CL3-073) was conducted in 316 patients with MDD who had experienced insufficient improvement with paroxetine (an SSRI) or venlafaxine (an SNRI). When treatment was switched from these antidepressants to agomelatine, discontinuation symptoms arose after cessation of the SSRI or SNRI treatment, either after abrupt cessation or gradual cessation of the previous treatment. These discontinuation symptoms may be confounded with a lack of early benefit of agomelatine. The percentage of patients with at least one discontinuation symptom one week after the SSRI/SNRI treatment was stopped was lower in the long tapering group (gradual cessation of the previous SSRI/SNRI within two weeks) than in the short tapering group (gradual cessation of the previous SSRI/SNRI within one week) and in the abrupt substitution group (abrupt cessation): 56.1%, 62.6% and 79.8% respectively.
Pharmacokinetics: Absorption: Agomelatine is rapidly and well absorbed (≥ 80%) after oral administration. The peak plasma concentration is reached within one to two hours after administration of agomelatine. Absolute bioavailability is low (approximately 1% at the therapeutic oral dose) and is highly variable due to the first pass effect and the inter-individual differences of CYP1A2 activity. The bioavailability is increased in women compared to men. Although not clinically relevant, the bioavailability is increased by intake of oral contraceptives and reduced by smoking. In the therapeutic dose-range, agomelatine exposure appears to increase proportionally with dose with saturation of the first pass effect occurring at supra-therapeutic doses (from 200 to 1200 mg).
Food intake (standard meal or high fat meal) reduced the peak concentration (C
max) by approximately 20 - 30% but did not modify overall absorption or bioavailability. The variability is increased with high fat food.
Distribution: Steady-state volume of distribution is about 35 L. Plasma protein binding is 95% irrespective of concentration and is not modified with age and in patients with renal impairment but the free fraction is doubled in patients with hepatic impairment.
Metabolism: Following oral administration, agomelatine is rapidly oxidized mainly by the hepatic cytochromes CYP1A2 (90%) and CYP2C9/CYP2C19 (10%). The major metabolites, hydroxylated and demethylated agomelatine, are not pharmacologically active and are rapidly conjugated and eliminated in the urine.
Excretion: Elimination is rapid. The mean plasma half-life is between one and two hours. Clearance is high (about 1100 mL/min) and essentially metabolic. Excretion is mainly urinary (80%) and corresponds to metabolites. Urinary excretion of the unchanged compound is negligible. Pharmacokinetics remained unchanged following repeated administration.
Special Populations: Severe renal impairment: In subjects with severe renal impairment the pharmacokinetic parameters C
max and AUC were slightly higher than in healthy subjects. However, due to the high inter-individual variability of agomelatine pharmacokinetics, this result was not clinically relevant. Renal impairment did not affect the protein binding of agomelatine.
Hepatic Impairment: Following a single oral dose of 25 mg agomelatine in patients with hepatic impairment, C
max increased by a factor of ~60 and ~110, while AUC increased by ~70-times and ~140-times, in mild (Child-Pugh score of 5 or 6) and moderate (Child-Pugh score of 7 to 9) hepatic impairment, respectively compared to healthy subjects. Both mild and moderate liver impairment increased the half-life of agomelatine by a factor of ~3. The unbound fraction of agomelatine was also increased in subjects with hepatic insufficiency. The inter-individual variability decreased with mild hepatic impairment, with a further decrease in moderate hepatic impairment, suggesting a progressive saturation of the hepatic first-pass effect. Agomelatine is therefore contraindicated in patients with hepatic impairment (see Contraindications).
Gender, smoking and age: No significant difference in exposure was shown between the young and the elderly as well as between males and females. Although not clinically relevant: a 3.7-fold decrease in mean exposure was observed in volunteers without depression who were heavy smokers (≥ 15 cigarettes per day); a decrease of 33% of agomelatine exposure has been shown in the smoker population (healthy volunteers and patients with depression smoking > 5 cigarettes per day) compared to non-smoker population, suggesting that cigarette smoking could induce CYP1A2 which is involved in the metabolism of agomelatine; in a pharmacokinetic study in elderly patients (aged ≥ 65 years), mean AUC and mean C
max were about 4-fold and 13-fold respectively higher for very elderly patients aged ≥ 75 years compared to elderly patients aged < 75 years, after an agomelatine dose of 25 mg. The results of that study were derived from a population pharmacokinetic analysis using data from saliva samples. No plasma samples were used in the study to determine or confirm correlation with the saliva samples. The total number of patients receiving agomelatine 50 mg was too low to draw any conclusions. No dose adaptation is recommended in elderly patients solely because of their age (up to the age of 75 years). Agomelatine should not be used in patients aged 75 years and older.
Toxicology: Preclinical Safety Data: Genotoxicity: Based on results from a standard battery of
in vitro and
in vivo assays, agomelatine is not considered to have genotoxic potential in humans receiving the maximum proposed clinical dose.
Carcinogenicity: Oral lifetime carcinogenicity trials with agomelatine were conducted in mice and rats. Male and female mice showed increased incidences of hepatocellular adenomas and hepatocellular carcinomas at systemic exposures (plasma AUC) about 15-fold human exposure at the maximal recommended clinical dose; the no-effect exposure was about 4-fold clinical exposure. Male rats showed an increased incidence of hepatocellular carcinomas at systemic exposures (plasma AUC) about 45-fold human exposure at the maximal recommended clinical dose; the no-effect exposure was about 8-fold clinical exposure. These effects were associated with liver enzyme induction in these species and are unlikely to be relevant to humans. In male and female rats, the frequency of benign mammary fibroadenomas was increased at high systemic exposures (30-fold or greater the exposure at the maximal recommended clinical dose) but remained within the historical control range. Malignant mammary tumours were not observed.