Pharmacotherapeutic Group: Antineoplastic agents, monoclonal antibodies.
ATC Code: L01XC03.
Pharmacology: Pharmacodynamics: Trastuzumab is a recombinant humanised IgG1 monoclonal antibody against the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). As per the published literature, in 20 %-30 % of primary breast cancers overexpression of HER2 is observed. Studies of HER2-positivity rates in gastric cancer (GC) using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence
in situ hybridization (FISH) or chromogenic
in situ hybridization (CISH) have shown that there is a broad variation of HER2-positivity ranging from 6.8 % to 34.0 % for IHC and 7.1 % to 42.6 % for FISH. Studies also indicate that breast cancer patients whose tumours overexpress HER2 have a shortened disease-free survival compared to patients whose tumours do not overexpress HER2. The extracellular domain of the receptor (ECD, p105) can be shed into the blood stream and measured in serum samples.
Mechanism of Action: As per the published literature, Trastuzumab has a tendency to bind with high affinity and specificity to sub-domain IV, a juxta-membrane region of HER2's extracellular domain. Binding of Trastuzumab to HER2 inhibits ligand-independent HER2 signalling and generally prevents the proteolytic cleavage of its extracellular domain, an activation mechanism of HER2. As a result, in both
in vitro animal assays, Trastuzumab has been shown, to inhibit the proliferation of human tumour cells that overexpress HER2. Additionally, it is known that Trastuzumab is a potent mediator of antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC). As per the published literature,
in vitro, trastuzumab mediated ADCC has been shown to be preferentially exerted on HER2 overexpressing cancer cells compared with cancer cells that do not overexpress HER2.
Detection of HER2 overexpression or HER2 gene amplification: Detection of HER2 overexpression or HER2 gene amplification in breast cancer: Trastuzumab should only be used in patients whose tumours have HER2 overexpression or HER2 gene amplification as determined by an accurate and validated method. HER2 overexpression should be detected using an immunohistochemistry (IHC)-based assessment of fixed tumour blocks (Refer to Precautions). HER2 gene amplification shall be detected using fluorescence
in situ hybridisation (FISH) or chromogenic
in situ hybridisation (CISH) of fixed tumour blocks (see Precautions). Patients are generally eligible for trastuzumab treatment if they show strong HER2 overexpression as described by a 3+ score by IHC or a positive FISH or CISH result.
To ensure accurate and reproducible results, the testing must be performed in a specialised laboratory, which can ensure validation as well as accuracy of the testing procedures. (See Table 1.)
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
As per the published literature, FISH is considered positive if the ratio of the HER2 gene copy number per tumour cell to the chromosome 17 copy number is greater than or equal to 2, or if there are more than 4 copies of the HER2 gene per tumour cell if no chromosome 17 control is used.
As per the published literature, GISH is considered positive it there are more than 5 copies of the HER2 gene per nucleus in greater than 50 % of tumour cells.
Detection of HER2 over expression or HER2 gene amplification in gastric cancer: Only an accurate and validated assay should be used to detect HER2 over expression or HER2 gene amplification. IHC is generally recommended as the first testing modality and in cases where HER2 gene amplification status is also required, either a silver-enhanced
in situ hybridization (SISH) or a FISH technique must be applied. SISH technology is however, recommended to allow for the parallel evaluation of tumor histology and morphology. HER2 testing must be performed in a laboratory having trained personnel/analysts, to ensure validation of testing procedures and the generation of accurate and reproducible results. Full instructions on assay performance and results interpretation should be taken from the product information leaflet provided with the HER2 testing assays used.
As per the published literature on another trastuzumab product, HER2 positive were defined as patients whose tumours were either IHC3+ or FISH positive and thus included in the trial. Based on the clinical trial results, the beneficial effects were limited to patients with the highest level of HER2 protein overexpression, defined by a 3+ score by IHC, or a 2+ score by IHC and a positive FISH result.
As per the published literature on another trastuzumab product, in a method comparison study for the detection of HER2 gene amplification in gastric cancer patients, a high degree of concordance (>95%) was observed for SISH and FISH techniques.
HER2 over expression should be detected using an immunohistochemistry (IHC)-based assessment of fixed tumour blocks; HER2 gene amplification should be detected using
in situ hybridisation using either SISH or FISH on fixed tumour blocks. (See Table 2.)
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
In general, SISH or FISH is considered positive if the ratio of the HER2 gene copy number per tumour cell to the chromosome 17 copy number is greater than or equal to 2.
Clinical Efficacy and Safety: Clinical efficacy and safety: The clinical efficacy of Trastuzumab plus docetaxel has been assessed in a randomised, double-blinded, comparative phase III study in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). There were no relevant differences between Trastuzumab and the reference product with regard to overall response rate (complete response + partial response), clinical benefit rate (complete response + partial response + stable disease) and progression free survival rate.
The following clinical efficacy results have been observed in various patient populations under the treatment with trastuzumab based on published information.
Metastatic breast cancer: Trastuzumab has generally been used in clinical trials as monotherapy for patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC) who have tumours that overexpress HER2 and who have also failed one or more chemotherapy regimens for their metastatic disease (trastuzumab alone).
As per the published literature on another trastuzumab product, trastuzumab has also been used in combination with paclitaxel or docetaxel for the treatment of patients who have not received chemotherapy for their metastatic disease. Patients who had previously received anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy were treated with paclitaxel (175 mg/m
2 infused over 3 hours) with or without trastuzumab. In the pivotal trial of docetaxel (100 mg/m
2 infused over 1 hour) with or without trastuzumab, 60 % of the patients had received prior anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients were treated with trastuzumab until progression of disease.
As per the published literature, the efficacy of trastuzumab in combination with paclitaxel in patients who did not receive prior adjuvant anthracyclines has not been studied. However, trastuzumab plus docetaxel was efficacious in patients whether or not they had received prior adjuvant anthracyclines.
As per the published literature, the test method for HER2 overexpression used to determine eligibility of patients in the pivotal trastuzumab monotherapy and trastuzumab plus paclitaxel clinical trials employed immunohistochemical staining for HER2 of fixed material from breast tumours using the murine monoclonal antibodies CB11 and 4D5. These tissues were fixed in formalin or Bouin's fixative. This investigative clinical trial assay performed in a central laboratory utilised a 0 to 3+ scale. Patients classified as staining 2+ or 3+ were included, while those staining 0 or 1+ were excluded. Greater than 70 % of patients enrolled exhibited 3+ overexpression. The data suggest that beneficial effects were greater among those patients with higher levels of overexpression of HER2 (3+).
As per the published literature on another trastuzumab product, the main test method used to determine HER2 positivity in the pivotal trial of docetaxel, with or without trastuzumab, was immunohistochemistry. A minority of patients was tested using fluorescence
in-situ hybridisation (FISH). In this trial, 87 % of patients entered had disease that was IHC3+, and 95 % of patients entered had disease that was IHC3+ and/or FISH-positive.
Weekly dosing in metastatic breast cancer: The efficacy results from the monotherapy and combination therapy studies as per the published literature are summarized in Table 3. (See Table 3.)
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
Combination treatment with Trastuzumab and Anastrozole: As per the published literature on another trastuzumab product, trastuzumab has been studied in combination with anastrozole for first line treatment of MBC in HER2 overexpressing, hormone-receptor (i.e. estrogen-receptor (ER) and/or progesterone-receptor (PR)) positive postmenopausal patients. Progression free survival was doubled in the trastuzumab plus anastrozole arm compared to anastrozole (4.8 months versus 2.4 months). For the other parameters the improvements seen for the combination were for overall response (16.5 % versus 6.7 %); clinical benefit rate (42.7 % versus 27.9 %); time to progression (4.8 months versus 2.4 months). For time to response and duration of response no difference could be recorded between the arms. The median overall survival was extended by 4.6 months for patients in the combination arm. The difference was not statistically significant, however more than half of the patients in the anastrozole alone arm crossed over to a trastuzumab containing regimen after progression of disease.
Three-weekly dosing in metastatic breast cancer: The efficacy results from the non-comparative monotherapy and combination therapy studies as per the published literature are summarized in Table 4: See Table 4.
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
Sites of progression: As per the published literature on another trastuzumab product, the frequency of progression in the liver was significantly reduced in patients treated with the combination of trastuzumab and paclitaxel, compared to paclitaxel alone (21.8 % versus 45.7 %; p=0.004). More patients treated with trastuzumab and paclitaxel progressed in the central nervous system than those treated with paclitaxel alone (12.6 % versus 6.5 %; p=0.377).
Early breast cancer (adjuvant setting): Early breast cancer is defined as non-metastatic primary invasive carcinoma of the breast. In the adjuvant setting, trastuzumab was investigated in 4 large multicentre, randomised, trials.
As per the published literature on another trastuzumab product, study was designed to compare one and two years of three-weekly trastuzumab treatment versus observation in patients with HER2 positive EBC following surgery, established chemotherapy and radiotherapy (if applicable). Comparison of two years versus one year trastuzumab treatment was performed additionally. Patients assigned to receive trastuzumab were given an initial loading dose of 8 mg/kg, followed by 6 mg/kg every three weeks for either one or two years.
As per the published literature on another trastuzumab product, that comprised of joint analysis to investigate the clinical utility of combining trastuzumab treatment with paclitaxel following AC chemotherapy, along with adding trastuzumab sequentially to AC→P chemotherapy in patients with HER2 positive EBC following surgery.
As per the published literature on another trastuzumab product, a study was designed to investigate combining trastuzumab treatment with docetaxel either following AC chemotherapy or in combination with docetaxel and carboplatin in patients with HER2 positive EBC following surgery.
As per the published literature on another trastuzumab product, early breast cancer in one of the trial was limited to operable, primary, invasive adenocarcinoma of the breast, with axillary nodes positive or axillary nodes negative if tumors at least 1 cm in diameter.
As per the published literature on another trastuzumab product, EBC was limited to women with operable breast cancer at high risk, defined as HER2-positive and axillary lymph node positive or HER2 positive and lymph node negative with high risk features (tumor size >1 cm and ER negative or tumor size >2 cm, regardless of hormonal status).
As per the published literature on another trastuzumab product, EBC was defined as either lymph node positive or high risk node negative patients with no (pN0) lymph node involvement, and at least 1 of the following factors: Tumour size greater than 2 cm, Estrogen receptor and Progesterone receptor negative, Histological and/or nuclear grade 2-3, or age < 35 years.
As per the published literature on another trastuzumab product, the efficacy results following 12 months* and 8 years** median follow-up are summarized as follows in Table 5. (See Table 5.)
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
The efficacy results from the interim efficacy analysis crossed the protocol pre-specified statistical boundary for the comparison of 1-year of trastuzumab versus observation. After a median follow-up of 12 months, the hazard ratio (HR) for disease free survival (DFS) was 0.54 (95 % CI 0.44, 0.67) which translates into an absolute benefit, in terms of a 2-year disease-free survival rate, of 7.6 percentage points (85.8 % versus 78.2 %) in favour of the trastuzumab arm.
A final analysis was performed after a median follow-up of 8 years, which showed that 1 year trastuzumab treatment is associated with a 24 % risk reduction compared to observation only (HR=0.76, 95 % CI 0.67, 0.86). This translates into an absolute benefit in terms of an 8 year disease free survival rate of 6.4 percentage points in favour of 1 year trastuzumab treatment.
In this final analysis, extending trastuzumab treatment for a duration of two years did not show additional benefit over treatment for 1 year [DFS HR in the intent to treat (ITT) population of 2 years versus 1 year=0.99 (95 % CI: 0.87, 1.13), p-value=0.90 and OS HR=0.98 (0.83, 1.15); p-value= 0.78]. The rate of asymptomatic cardiac dysfunction was increased in the 2-year treatment arm (8.1 % versus 4.6 % in the 1-year treatment arm). More patients experienced at least one grade 3 or 4 adverse event in the 2-year treatment arm (20.4 %) compared with the 1-year treatment arm (16.3 %).
As per the published literature on another trastuzumab product, trastuzumab was administered in combination with paclitaxel, following AC chemotherapy.
As per the published literature on another trastuzumab product, Doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide were administered concurrently as follows: intravenous push doxorubicin, at 60 mg/m
2, given every 3 weeks for 4 cycles; intravenous cyclophosphamide, at 600 mg/m
2 over 30 minutes, given every 3 weeks for 4 cycles.
As per the published literature, Paclitaxel, in combination with another trastuzumab product, was administered as follows: intravenous paclitaxel - 80 mg/m
2 as a continuous intravenous infusion, given every week for 12 weeks, or intravenous paclitaxel - 175 mg/m
2 as a continuous intravenous infusion, given every 3 weeks for 4 cycles (day 1 of each cycle).
As per the published literature on another trastuzumab product, the efficacy results are summarized in Table 6. The median duration of follow up was 1.8 years for the patients in the AC→P arm and 2.0 years for patients in the AC→PH arm. (See Table 6.)
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
For the primary endpoint, DFS, the addition of trastuzumab to paclitaxel chemotherapy resulted in a 52 % decrease in the risk of disease recurrence. The hazard ratio translates into an absolute benefit, in terms of 3-year disease-free survival rate estimates of 11.8 percentage points (87.2 % versus 75.4 %) in favour of the AC→PH (another trastuzumab product) arm.
At the time of a safety update after a median of 3.5-3.8 years follow up, an analysis of DFS reconfirms the magnitude of the benefit shown in the definitive analysis of DFS. Despite the cross-over to trastuzumab in the control arm, the addition of trastuzumab to paclitaxel chemotherapy resulted in a 52 % decrease in the risk of disease recurrence. The addition of trastuzumab to paclitaxel chemotherapy also resulted in a 37 % decrease in the risk of death.
As per the published literature on another trastuzumab product, the pre-planned final analysis of OS was performed when 707 deaths had occurred (median follow-up 8.3 years in the AC→PH group). Treatment with AC→PH resulted in a statistically significant improvement in OS compared with AC→P (stratified HR=0.64; 95% CI [0.55, 0.74]; log-rank p-value <0.0001). At 8 years, the survival rate was estimated to be 86.9% in the AC→PH arm and 79.4% in the AC→P arm, an absolute benefit of 7.4% (95% CI 4.9%, 10.0%).
The final OS results from the joint analysis are summarized in Table 7 as follows: See Table 7.
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
As per the published literature on another trastuzumab product, DFS analysis was also performed at the final analysis of OS. The updated DFS analysis results (stratified HR = 0.61; 95% CI [0.54, 0.69]) showed a similar DFS benefit compared to the definitive primary DFS analysis, despite 24.8% patients in the AC→P arm who crossed over to receive reference product. At 8 years, the disease-free survival rate was estimated to be 77.2% (95% CI: 75.4, 79.1) in the AC→PH arm, an absolute benefit of 11.8% compared with the AC→P arm.
As per the published literature on another trastuzumab product, trastuzumab was administered either in combination with docetaxel, following AC chemotherapy (AC→DH) or in combination with docetaxel and carboplatin (DCarbH).
Docetaxel was administered as follows: intravenous docetaxel - 100 mg/m
2 as an intravenous infusion over 1 hour, given every 3 weeks for 4 cycles (day 2 of first docetaxel cycle, then day 1 of each subsequent cycle), or intravenous docetaxel - 75 mg/m
2 as an intravenous infusion over 1 hour, given every 3 weeks for 6 cycles (day 2 of cycle 1, then day 1 of each subsequent cycle) which was followed by: carboplatin-at target AUC = 6 mg/mL/min administered by intravenous infusion over 30-60 minutes repeated every 3 weeks for a total of six cycles.
Trastuzumab was administered weekly with chemotherapy and 3 weekly thereafter for a total of 52 weeks.
As per the published literature on another trastuzumab product, the efficacy results are summarized in Tables 8 and 9. The median duration of follow up was 2.9 years in the AC→D arm and 3.0 years in each of the AC→DH and DCarbH arms. (See Tables 8 and 9.)
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
As per the published literature on another trastuzumab product, for the primary endpoint, DFS, the hazard ratio translates into an absolute benefit, in terms of 3-year disease-free survival rate estimates of 5.8 percentage points (86.7 % versus 80.9 %) in favour of the AC→DH (trastuzumab) arm and 4.6 percentage points (85.5 % versus 80.9 %) in favour of the DCarbH (trastuzumab) arm compared to AC→D.
As per the published literature on another trastuzumab product, 213/1075 patients in the DCarbH (TCH) arm, 221/1074 patients in the AC→DH (AC→TH) arm, and 217/1073 in the AC→D (AC→T) arm had a Karnofsky performance status ≤90 (either 80 or 90). No disease-free survival (DFS) benefit was noticed in this subgroup of patients (hazard ratio = 1.16, 95 % CI [0.73, 1.83] for DCarbH (TCH) versus AC→D (AC→T); hazard ratio 0.97, 95 % CI [0.60, 1.55] for AC→DH (AC→TH) versus AC→D).
As per the published literature on another trastuzumab product, a post-hoc exploratory analysis was performed on the data sets from the joint analysis combining DFS events and symptomatic cardiac events and summarised in Table 10: See Table 10.
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
Early breast cancer (neoadjuvant-adjuvant setting): So far, no results are available which compare the efficacy of trastuzumab administered with chemotherapy in the adjuvant setting with that obtained in the neo-adjuvant/adjuvant setting.
As per the published literature on another trastuzumab product, in the neoadjuvant-adjuvant setting, a multicentre randomised trial, was designed to investigate the clinical efficacy of concurrent administration of trastuzumab with neoadjuvant chemotherapy including both an anthracycline and a taxane, followed by adjuvant trastuzumab, up to a total treatment duration of 1 year. The study recruited patients with newly diagnosed locally advanced (Stage III) or inflammatory EBC. Patients with HER2+ tumours were randomised to receive either neoadjuvant chemotherapy concurrently with neoadjuvant-adjuvant trastuzumab, or neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone.
As per the published literature on another trastuzumab product, trastuzumab (8 mg/kg loading dose, followed by 6 mg/kg maintenance every 3 weeks) was administered concurrently with 10 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy as follows: Doxorubicin 60 mg/m
2 and paclitaxel 150 mg/m
2, administered 3-weekly for 3 cycles, which was followed by Paclitaxel 175 mg/m
2 administered 3-weekly for 4 cycles, which was followed by CMF on day 1 and 8 every 4 weeks for 3 cycles, which was followed after surgery by additional cycles of adjuvant trastuzumab (to complete 1 year of treatment).
The efficacy results are summarized in Table 11. The median duration of follow-up in the trastuzumab arm was 3.8 years. (See Table 11.)
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
An absolute benefit of 13 percentage points in favour of the trastuzumab arm was estimated in terms of 3-year event-free survival rate (65 % versus 52 %).
Metastatic gastric cancer: As per the published literature on another trastuzumab product, trastuzumab has been investigated in one randomised, open-label phase III trial in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone.
Chemotherapy was administered as follows: capecitabine - 1000 mg/m
2 orally twice daily for 14 days every 3 weeks for 6 cycles (evening of day 1 to morning of day 15 of each cycle), or intravenous 5-fluorouracil - 800 mg/m
2/day as a continuous intravenous infusion over 5 days, given every 3 weeks for 6 cycles (days 1 to 5 of each cycle).
Either of which was administered with: cisplatin - 80 mg/m
2 every 3 weeks for 6 cycles on day 1 of each cycle.
As per the published literature on another trastuzumab product, the efficacy results are summarized in Table 12: See Table 12.
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
Patients were recruited to the trial who were previously untreated for HER2-positive inoperable locally advanced or recurrent and/or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastro-oesophageal junction not amenable to curative therapy. The primary endpoint was overall survival which was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause. At the time of the analysis a total of 349 randomized patients had died: 182 patients (62.8 %) in the control arm and 167 patients (56.8 %) in the treatment arm. The majority of the deaths were due to events related to the underlying cancer.
Post-hoc subgroup analyses indicate that positive treatment effects are limited to targeting tumours with higher levels of HER2 protein (IHC 2+/FISH+ or IHC 3+). The median overall survival for the high HER2 expressing group was 11.8 months versus 16 months, HR 0.65 (95 % CI 0.51-0.83) and the median progression free survival was 5.5 months versus 7.6 months, HR 0.64 (95 % CI 0.51-0.79) for FP versus FP + H, respectively. For overall survival, the HR was 0.75 (95 % CI 0.51-1.11) in the IHC 2+/FISH+ group and the HR was 0.58 (95 % CI 0.41-0.81) in the IHC 3+/FISH+ group.
As per the published literature on another trastuzumab product, in an exploratory subgroup analysis there was no apparent benefit on overall survival with the addition of trastuzumab in patients with ECOG PS 2 at baseline [HR 0.96 (95 % CI 0.51-1.79)], non measurable [HR 1.78 (95 % CI 0.87-3.66)] and locally advanced disease [HR 1.20 (95 % CI 0.29-4.97)].
Immunogenicity: As per the published literature on another trastuzumab product, 903 breast cancer patients treated with trastuzumab, alone or in combination with chemotherapy, have been evaluated for antibody production. Human anti-trastuzumab antibodies were detected in one patient, who had no allergic manifestations.
As per the published literature, there are no immunogenicity data available for trastuzumab in gastric cancer.
Pharmacokinetics: As per the published literature, the pharmacokinetics of trastuzumab have been studied in patients with metastatic breast cancer, early breast cancer and advanced gastric cancer patients. Formal drug-drug interaction studies have not been performed with trastuzumab.
Breast cancer: As per the published literature on another trastuzumab product, short duration intravenous infusions of 10, 50, 100, 250, and 500 mg trastuzumab once weekly in patients demonstrated non-linear pharmacokinetics where clearance decreased with increasing dose.
Half-life: The elimination half-life is of 28-38 days and subsequently the washout period is up to 27 weeks (190 days or 5 elimination half-lives).
Steady State pharmacokinetics: As per the published literature, steady state should be reached by approximately 27 weeks. In a population pharmacokinetic (two compartment, model-dependent) assessment of Phase I, II and III clinical trials in metastatic breast cancer on another trastuzumab product, the median predicted AUC at steady state over a three-week period was three times 578 mg.day/L (1677 mg.day/L) with 3 weekly doses of 2 mg/kg and 1793 mg.day/L with one every three week dose of 6 mg/kg; the estimated median peak concentrations were 104 mg/L and 189 mg/L and the trough concentrations were 64.9 mg/L and 47.3 mg/L, respectively.
As per the published literature on another trastuzumab product, early breast cancer patients administered an initial loading dose of 8 mg/kg followed by a three weekly maintenance dose of 6 mg/kg for 1 year, achieved steady state mean C
max of 225 μg/mL and mean C
max of 68.9 μg/mL at day 21 of cycle 18, the last cycle of treatment for 1 year of treatment. These concentrations were comparable to those reported previously in patients with metastatic breast cancer.
Clearance (CL): As per the published literature on another trastuzumab product, the typical trastuzumab clearance (for a body weight of 68 kg) was 0.241 L/day.
The effects of patient characteristics (such as age or serum creatinine) on the disposition of trastuzumab have been evaluated. The data suggest that the disposition of trastuzumab is not altered in any of these groups of patients (Refer to Dosage & Administration) however, studies were not specifically designed to investigate the impact of renal impairment upon pharmacokinetics.
Volume of distribution: As per the published literature, in all clinical studies, the volume of distribution of the central (Vc) and the peripheral (Vp) compartment was 3.02 L and 2.68 L, respectively, in the typical patient.
Circulating shed antigen: As per the published literature on another trastuzumab product, detectable concentrations of the circulating extracellular domain of the HER2 receptor (shed antigen) are found in the serum of some patients with HER2 over expressing breast cancers. Determination of shed antigen in baseline serum samples revealed that 64 % (286/447) of patients had detectable shed antigen, which ranged as high as 1880 ng/mL (median = 11 ng/mL). Patients with higher baseline shed antigen levels were more likely to have lower serum trough concentrations of trastuzumab. However, with weekly dosing, most patients with elevated shed antigen levels achieved target serum concentrations of trastuzumab by week 6 and no significant relationship has been observed between baseline shed antigen and clinical response.
Advanced Gastric Cancer: Steady state pharmacokinetics: As per the published literature on another trastuzumab product, a two compartment nonlinear population pharmacokinetic model, based on data from Phase III study, was used to estimate the steady state pharmacokinetics in patients with advanced gastric cancer administered trastuzumab at a loading dose of 8 mg/kg followed by a 3-weekly maintenance dose of 6 mg/kg. The observed serum levels of trastuzumab were lower and thus total clearance was estimated to be higher in AGC patients compared to breast cancer patients receiving the same dosing regimen. The reason for this is unknown. At high concentrations, total clearance is dominated by linear clearance, and the half-life in AGC patients is approximately 26 days. The median predicted steady-state AUC values (over a period of 3 weeks at steady state) is equal to 1213 mg.day/L, the median steady-state C
max is equal to 132 mg/L and the median steady-state C
min values is equal to 27.6 mg/L.
There are no data on the level of circulating extracellular domain of the HER2 receptor (shed antigen) in the serum of gastric cancer patients.
Toxicology: Preclinical Safety Data: As per the published literature on another trastuzumab product, there was no evidence of acute or multiple dose-related toxicity in studies of up to 6 months, or reproductive toxicity in teratology, female fertility or late gestational toxicity/placental transfer studies. Trastuzumab is not genotoxic. Long-term animal studies have not been performed to establish the carcinogenic potential of trastuzumab, or to determine its effects on fertility in males.
No clinically relevant adverse events were observed at the highest dose levels tested during the single and repeat dose toxicity studies of Trastuzumab in mice and rabbits. Local tolerance was evaluated during the toxicity studies, and no clinically relevant toxic effects were observed.