Pharmacotherapeutic Group: Folic acid analogues.
ATC Code: L01BA04.
Pharmacology: Pharmacodynamics: Pemetrexed is a multi-targeted anticancer antifolate agent that exerts its action by disrupting crucial folate-dependent metabolic processes essential for cell replication.
In vitro studies have shown that pemetrexed behaves as a multi-targeted antifolate by inhibiting thymidylate synthase (TS), dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) and glycinamide ribonucleotide formyltransferase (GARFT), which are key folate-dependent enzymes for the
de novo biosynthesis of thymidine and purine nucleotides. Pemetrexed is transported into cells by both the reduced folate carrier and membrane folate binding protein transport systems. Once in the cell, pemetrexed is rapidly and efficiently converted to polyglutamate forms by the enzyme folylpolyglutamate synthetase. The polyglutamate forms are retained in cells and are even more potent inhibitors of TS and GARFT. Polyglutamation is a time- and concentration-dependent process that occurs in tumour cells and, to a lesser extent, in normal tissues. Polyglutamated metabolites have an increased intracellular half-life resulting in prolonged drug action in malignant cells.
Clinical Efficacy: Mesothelioma: EMPHACIS, a multicentre, randomised, single-blind phase 3 study of Alimta plus cisplatin versus cisplatin in chemo-naive patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma, has shown that patients treated with Alimta and cisplatin had a clinically meaningful 2.8-month median survival advantage over patients receiving cisplatin alone.
During the study, low-dose folic acid and vitamin B
12 supplementation was introduced to patient therapy to reduce toxicity. The primary analysis of this study was performed on the population of all patients randomly assigned to a treatment arm who received the study drug (randomised and treated). A subgroup analysis was performed on patients who received folic acid and vitamin B
12 supplementation during the entire course of study therapy (fully supplemented). The results of these analyses of efficacy are summarised in Table 1. (See Table 1.)
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
A statistically significant improvement of the clinically relevant symptoms (pain and dyspnoea) associated with malignant pleural mesothelioma in the Alimta/cisplatin arm (212 patients) versus the cisplatin arm alone (218 patients) was demonstrated using the lung cancer symptom scale. Statistically significant differences in pulmonary function tests were also observed. The separation between the treatment arms was achieved by improvement in lung function in the Alimta/cisplatin arm and deterioration of lung function over time in the control arm.
There are limited data in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma treated with Alimta alone. Alimta at a dose of 500 mg/m
2 was studied as a single-agent in 64 chemo-naive patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. The overall response rate was 14.1%.
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) 2nd-Line Treatment: A multicentre, randomised, open-label phase 3 study of Alimta versus docetaxel in patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC after prior chemotherapy has shown median survival times of 8.3 months for patients treated with Alimta [intent to treat population (ITT) n=283] and 7.9 months for patients treated with docetaxel (ITT n=288). An analysis of the impact of NSCLC histology on the treatment effect on overall survival was in favour of Alimta versus docetaxel for other than predominantly squamous histologies (n=399, 9.3 versus 8 months, adjusted HR=0.78; 95% CI=0.61-1, p=0.047) and was in favour of docetaxel for squamous cell carcinoma histology (n=172, 6.2 versus 7.4 months, adjusted hazard ratio (HR)=1.56; 95% CI=1.08-2.26, p=0.018). There were no clinically relevant differences observed for the safety profile of Alimta within the histology subgroups.
Limited clinical data from a separate randomized, phase 3, controlled trial, suggest that efficacy data (overall survival, progression-free survival) for pemetrexed are similar between patients previously pre-treated with docetaxel (n=41) and patients who did not receive previous docetaxel treatment (n=540). (See Table 2.)
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, 1st-Line Treatment: A multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 study of Alimta plus cisplatin versus gemcitabine plus cisplatin in chemonaive patients with locally advanced or metastatic (stage IIIb or IV) NSCLC showed that Alimta plus cisplatin (ITT population n=862) met its primary endpoint and showed similar clinical efficacy as gemcitabine plus cisplatin (ITT n=863) in overall survival (adjusted HR 0.94; 95% CI=0.84-1.05). All patients included in this study had an eastern cooperative oncology group (ECOG) performance status 0 or 1.
The primary efficacy analysis was based on the ITT population. Sensitivity analyses of main efficacy endpoints were also assessed on the protocol qualified (PQ) population. The efficacy analyses using PQ population are consistent with the analyses for the ITT population and support the non-inferiority of AC versus GC.
Progression free survival (PFS) and overall response rate were similar between treatment arms: Median PFS was 4.8 months for Alimta plus cisplatin versus 5.1 months for gemcitabine plus cisplatin (adjusted HR 1.04; 95% CI=0.94-1.15) and overall response rate was 30.6% (95% CI = 27.3-33.9) for Alimta plus cisplatin versus 28.2% (95% CI=25-31.4) for gemcitabine plus cisplatin. Progression free survival data were partially confirmed by an independent review (400/1725 patients were randomly selected for review).
The analysis of the impact of NSCLC histology on overall survival demonstrated clinically relevant differences in survival according to histology is shown on table 3 and figure 1. (See Table 3 and Figure 1.)
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
There were no clinically relevant differences observed for the safety profile of Alimta plus cisplatin within the histology subgroups.
Patients treated with Alimta and cisplatin required fewer transfusions (16.4% vs 28.9%, p<0.001), red blood cell transfusions (16.1% vs 27.3%, p<0.001) and platelet transfusions (1.8% vs 4.5%, p=0.002). Patients also required lower administration of erythropoietin/darbopoietin (10.4% vs 18.1%, p<0.001), G-CSF/GM-CSF (3.1% vs 6.1%, p=0.004) and iron preparations (4.3% versus 7.0%, p=0.021).
Non-Small Lung Cell Cancer Maintenance Treatment: JMEN: A multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study (JMEN), compared the efficacy and safety of maintenance treatment with Alimta plus best supportive care (BSC) (n=441) with that of placebo plus BSC (n=222) in patients with locally advanced (stage IIIB) or metastatic (stage IV) NSCLC who did not progress after 4 cycles of first-line doublet therapy containing cisplatin or carboplatin in combination with gemcitabine, paclitaxel, or docetaxel. First-line doublet therapy containing Alimta was not included. All patients included in this study had an ECOG performance status 0 or 1. Patients received maintenance treatment until disease progression. Efficacy and safety were measured from the time of randomisation after completion of first-line (induction) therapy. Patients received a median of 5 cycles of maintenance treatment with Alimta and 3.5 cycles of placebo. A total of 213 patients (48.3%) completed ≥6 cycles and a total of 103 patients (23.4%) completed ≥10 cycles of treatment with Alimta.
The study met its primary endpoint and showed a statistically significant improvement in PFS in the Alimta arm over the placebo arm (n=581, independently reviewed population; median of 4 months and 2 months, respectively) (HR=0.6, 95% CI=0.49-0.73, p<0.00001). The independent review of patient scans confirmed the findings of the investigator assessment of PFS. The median OS for the overall population (n=663) was 13.4 months for the Alimta arm and 10.6 months for the placebo arm, HR=0.79 (95% CI=0.65-0.95, p=0.01192).
Consistent with other Alimta studies, a difference in efficacy according to NSCLC histology was observed in JMEN. For patients with NSCLC other than predominantly squamous cell histology (n=430, independently reviewed population) median PFS was 4.4 months for the Alimta arm and 1.8 months for the placebo arm, HR=0.47 (95% CI=0.37-0.60, p=0.00001). The median OS for patients with NSCLC other than predominantly squamous cell histology (n=481) was 15.5 months for the Alimta arm and 10.3 months for the placebo arm, HR=0.70 (95% CI=0.56-0.88, p=0.002). Including the induction phase, the median OS for patients with NSCLC other than predominantly squamous cell histology was 18.6 months for the Alimta arm and 13.6 months for the placebo arm, HR=0.71 (95% CI=0.56-0.88, p=0.002).
The PFS and OS results in patients with squamous cell histology suggested no advantage for Alimta over placebo.
There were no clinically relevant differences observed for the safety profile of Alimta within the histology subgroups. (See Figure 2).
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
Paramount: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study (Paramount), compared the efficacy and safety of continuation maintenance treatment with Alimta plus best supportive care (BSC) (n=359) with that of placebo plus BSC (n=180) in patients with locally advanced (stage IIIB) or metastatic (stage IV) NSCLC other than predominantly squamous cell histology which did not progress after 4 cycles of first-line doublet therapy of Alimta in combination with cisplatin. Of the 939 patients treated with Alimta plus cisplatin induction, 539 patients were randomized to maintenance treatment with pemetrexed or placebo. Of randomized patients, 44.9% had a complete/partial response and 51.9% had a response of stable disease to Alimta plus cisplatin induction. Patients randomized to maintenance treatment were required to have an ECOG performance status 0 or 1. The median time from the start of Alimta plus cisplatin induction therapy to the start of maintenance treatment was 2.96 months on both the pemetrexed arm and the placebo arm. Randomized patients received maintenance treatment until disease progression. Efficacy and safety were measured from the time of randomization after completion of first-line (induction) therapy. Patients received a median of 4 cycles of maintenance treatment with Alimta and 4 cycles of placebo. A total of 109 patients (30.4%) completed ≥ 6 cycles maintenance treatment with Alimta, representing at least 10 cycles of Alimta.
The study met its primary endpoint and showed a statistically significant improvement in PFS in the Alimta arm over the placebo arm (n=472, independently reviewed population; media of 3.9 months and 2.6 months, respectively) (HR=0.64, 95% CI=0.51-0.81, p=0.0002), the independent review of patient scans confirmed the findings of the investigator assessment of PFS. For randomized patients, as measured from the start of Alimta plus cisplatin first-line induction treatment, the median investigator-assessed PFS was 6.9 months for the Alimta arm and 5.59 months for the placebo arm (HR= 0.59, 95% CI=0.47-0.74). A preliminary survival analysis showed that the median survival on the Alimta continuation arm after induction therapy with Alimta/cisplatin (4 cycles) was 13.9 months versus 11.1 months for those on the placebo arm (HR=0.78, 95% CI=0.60-0.98, p=0.034) at the time of this preliminary survival analysis, 48% of patients were alive on the Alimta arm versus 38% on the placebo arm, with a median follow-up of 11.04 months. (See Figure 3).
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
Pharmacokinetics: The pharmacokinetic properties of pemetrexed following single-agent administration have been evaluated in 426 cancer patients with a variety of solid tumours at doses ranging from 0.2-838 mg/m
2 infused over a 10-min period. Pemetrexed has a steady-state volume of distribution of 9 L/m
2.
In vitro studies indicate that pemetrexed is approximately 81% bound to plasma proteins. Binding was not notably affected by varying degrees of renal impairment. Pemetrexed undergoes limited hepatic metabolism. Pemetrexed is primarily eliminated in the urine, with 70-90% of the administered dose being recovered unchanged in urine within the first 24 hrs following administration. Pemetrexed total systemic clearance is 91.8 mL/min and the elimination half-life (t
1/2) from plasma is 3.5 hrs in patients with normal renal function [creatinine clearance (CrCl) of 90 mL/min]. Between patient variability in clearance is moderate at 19.3%. Pemetrexed total systemic exposure (AUC) and maximum plasma concentration (C
max) increase proportionally with dose. The pharmacokinetics of pemetrexed are consistent over multiple treatment cycles.
The pharmacokinetic properties of pemetrexed are not influenced by concurrently administered cisplatin. Oral folic acid and vitamin B
12 IM supplementation do not affect the pharmacokinetics of pemetrexed.
Toxicology: Preclinical Safety Data: Administration of pemetrexed to pregnant mice resulted in decreased foetal viability and weight, incomplete ossification of some skeletal structures and cleft palate.
Administration of pemetrexed to male mice resulted in reproductive toxicity characterised by reduced fertility rates and testicular atrophy. In a study conducted in beagle dog by IV bolus injection for 9 months, testicular findings (degeneration/necrosis of the seminiferous epithelium) have been observed. This suggests that pemetrexed may impair male fertility. Female fertility was not investigated.
Pemetrexed was not mutagenic in either the
in vitro chromosome aberration test in Chinese hamster ovary cells or the Ames test. Pemetrexed has been shown to be clastogenic in the
in vivo micronucleus test in the mouse.
Studies to assess the carcinogenic potential of pemetrexed have not been conducted.