Tabulated list of adverse reactions: The following adverse reactions have been identified based on evaluation of the full duration of the phase 2 and phase 3 clinical studies, the long-term cardiovascular outcome study and post-marketing reports. The adverse reactions are listed in Table 13 as MedDRA preferred term by system organ class and in order of decreasing incidence (very common: ≥1/10; common: ≥1/100 to <1/10; uncommon: ≥1/1,000 to <1/100; rare: ≥1/10,000 to <1/1,000; very rare: <1/10,000 and not known: cannot be estimated from available data). Within each incidence grouping, adverse reactions are presented in order of decreasing frequency. Frequencies for events have been calculated based on their incidence in the phase 2 and phase 3 registration studies. (See Table 13.)

Description of selected adverse reactions: Hypoglycaemia: When dulaglutide 0.75 mg and 1.5 mg were used as monotherapy or in combination with metformin alone or metformin and pioglitazone, the incidences of documented symptomatic hypoglycaemia were 5.9% to 10.9% and the rates were 0.14 to 0.62 events/patient/year, and no episodes of severe hypoglycaemia were reported.
The incidences of documented symptomatic hypoglycaemia when dulaglutide 0.75 mg and 1.5 mg, respectively, were used in combination with a sulphonylurea and metformin were 39.0% and 40.3% and the rates were 1.67 and 1.67 events/patient/year. The severe hypoglycaemia event incidences were 0% and 0.7%, and rates were 0.00 and 0.01 events/patient/year for each dose, respectively. The incidence of documented symptomatic hypoglycaemia when dulaglutide 1.5 mg was used with sulphonylurea alone was 11.3% and the rate was 0.90 events/patient/year, and there were no episodes of severe hypoglycaemia.
The incidence of documented symptomatic hypoglycaemia when dulaglutide 1.5 mg was used in combination with insulin glargine was 35.3% and the rate was 3.38 events/patient/year. The severe hypoglycaemia event incidence was 0.7% and the rate was 0.01 events/patient/year.
The incidences when dulaglutide 0.75 mg and 1.5 mg, respectively, were used in combination with prandial insulin were 85.3% and 80.0% and rates were 35.66 and 31.06 events/patient/year. The severe hypoglycaemia event incidences were 2.4% and 3.4%, and rates were 0.05 and 0.06 events/patient/year.
In a phase 3 study through to week 52, when dulaglutide 1.5 mg, 3 mg and 4.5 mg were used in combination with metformin, the incidences of documented symptomatic hypoglycaemia were 3.1%, 2.4% and 3.1%, respectively, and rates were 0.07, 0.05 and 0.07 events/patient/year; one episode of severe hypoglycaemia was reported with dulaglutide 1.5 mg and 4.5 mg, respectively.
Gastrointestinal adverse reactions: Cumulative reporting of gastrointestinal events up to 104 weeks with dulaglutide 0.75 mg and 1.5 mg, respectively, included nausea (12.9% and 21.2%), diarrhoea (10.7% and 13.7%) and vomiting (6.9% and 11.5%). These were typically mild or moderate in severity and were reported to peak during the first 2 weeks of treatment and rapidly declined over the next 4 weeks, after which the rate remained relatively constant.
In a phase 3 study with 1.5 mg, 3 mg and 4.5 mg dulaglutide doses respectively, cumulative reporting of gastrointestinal events through to 52 weeks included nausea (14.2%, 16.1% and 17.3%), diarrhoea (7.7%, 12.0% and 11.6%) and vomiting (6.4%, 9.1% and 10.1%). In clinical pharmacology studies conducted in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus up to 6 weeks, the majority of gastrointestinal events were reported during the first 2-3 days after the initial dose and declined with subsequent doses.
Acute pancreatitis: The incidence of acute pancreatitis in phase 2 and 3 registration studies was 0.07% for dulaglutide compared to 0.14% for placebo and 0.19% for comparators with or without additional background antidiabetic therapy. Acute pancreatitis and pancreatitis have also been reported in the post-marketing setting.
Pancreatic enzymes: Dulaglutide is associated with mean increases from baseline in pancreatic enzymes (lipase and/or pancreatic amylase) of 11% to 21% (see Precautions). In the absence of other signs and symptoms of acute pancreatitis, elevations in pancreatic enzymes alone are not predictive of acute pancreatitis.
Heart rate increase: Small mean increases in heart rate of 2 to 4 beats per minute (bpm) and a 1.3% and 1.4% incidence of sinus tachycardia, with a concomitant increase from baseline ≥15 bpm, were observed with dulaglutide 0.75 mg and 1.5 mg, respectively.
In a phase 3 study with 1.5 mg, 3 mg and 4.5 mg dulaglutide doses, the incidence of sinus tachycardia, with a concomitant increase from baseline ≥15 bpm, was 2.6%, 1.9% and 2.6% respectively. Mean increases in heart rate of 1-4 beats per minute (bpm) were observed.
First degree AV block/PR interval prolongation: Small mean increases from baseline in PR interval of 2 to 3 msec and a 1.5% and 2.4% incidence of first‑degree AV block were observed with dulaglutide 0.75 mg and 1.5 mg, respectively.
In a phase 3 study with 1.5 mg, 3 mg and 4.5 mg dulaglutide doses, the incidence of first-degree AV block was 1.2%, 3.8% and 1.7% respectively. Mean increases from baseline in PR interval of 3-5 msec were observed.
Immunogenicity: In registration studies, treatment with dulaglutide was associated with a 1.6% incidence of treatment emergent dulaglutide anti‑drug antibodies, indicating that the structural modifications in the GLP‑1 and modified IgG4 parts of the dulaglutide molecule, together with high homology with native GLP‑1 and native IgG4, minimise the risk of immune response against dulaglutide. Patients with dulaglutide anti‑drug antibodies generally had low titres, and although the number of patients developing dulaglutide anti‑drug antibodies was low, examination of the phase 3 data revealed no clear impact of dulaglutide anti‑drug antibodies on changes in HbA1c. None of the patients with systemic hypersensitivity developed dulaglutide anti‑drug antibodies.
Hypersensitivity: In the phase 2 and phase 3 registration studies, systemic hypersensitivity events (e.g., urticaria, edema) were reported in 0.5% of patients receiving dulaglutide. Cases of anaphylactic reaction have been rarely reported with marketed use of dulaglutide.
Injection site reactions: Injection site adverse events were reported in 1.9% of patients receiving dulaglutide. Potentially immune‑mediated injection site adverse events (e.g., rash, erythema) were reported in 0.7% of patients and were usually mild.
Discontinuation due to an adverse event: In studies of 26 weeks duration, the incidence of discontinuation due to adverse events was 2.6% (0.75 mg) and 6.1% (1.5 mg) for dulaglutide versus 3.7% for placebo. Through the full study duration (up to 104 weeks), the incidence of discontinuation due to adverse events was 5.1% (0.75 mg) and 8.4% (1.5 mg) for dulaglutide. The most frequent adverse reactions leading to discontinuation for 0.75 mg and 1.5 mg dulaglutide, respectively, were nausea (1.0%, 1.9%), diarrhoea (0.5%, 0.6%), and vomiting (0.4%, 0.6%), and were generally reported within the first 4-6 weeks.
In a phase 3 study with 1.5 mg, 3 mg and 4.5 mg dulaglutide doses, the incidence of discontinuation due to adverse events through 52 weeks was 6.0% (1.5 mg), 7.0% (3 mg) and 8.5% (4.5 mg). The most frequent adverse reactions leading to discontinuation for dulaglutide 1.5 mg, 3 mg and 4.5 mg, respectively, were nausea (1.3%, 1.3%, 1.5%), diarrhoea (0.2%, 1.0%, 1.0%), and vomiting (0.0%, 0.8%, 1.3%).
Dulaglutide doses of 3 mg and 4.5 mg: The safety profile in patients treated with dulaglutide 3 mg and 4.5 mg once weekly is consistent with that described previously for dulaglutide doses of 0.75 mg and 1.5 mg once weekly.
Paediatric population: The safety profile in paediatric patients aged 10 years and above treated with dulaglutide 0.75 mg and 1.5 mg once-weekly is comparable with that described previously for adult patients.
The immunogenicity profile in paediatric patients treated with dulaglutide is consistent with that described previously for adult patients. In the paediatric study, 2.1% and 4.0% of patients treated with placebo and dulaglutide respectively developed treatment emergent dulaglutide anti-drug antibodies.
Reporting of suspected adverse reactions: Reporting suspected adverse reactions after authorisation of the medicinal product is important. It allows continued monitoring of the benefit/risk balance of the medicinal product. Healthcare professionals are asked to report any suspected adverse reactions to the Drug Office, Department of Health.
View ADR Reporting Link